Improving Outcomes-Based Engineering Education in Australia

By Palmer, Stuart; Ferguson, Clive | Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, October 2008 | Go to article overview

Improving Outcomes-Based Engineering Education in Australia

Palmer, Stuart, Ferguson, Clive, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education


Graduate attributes are now a ubiquitous feature of higher education in Australia and internationally, and have been part of engineering education for more than a decade. The idea of graduate attributes is an apparently simple concept, focusing on educational outcomes, rather than inputs and process. However, research has revealed limited understanding of graduate attributes among educators and an often superficial response to graduate attributes by institutions. While there is evidence of some benefits in engineering education arising from the introduction of outcomes-based accreditation, there is also evidence of many short-comings of the graduate attributes approach. This paper seeks to explore the issues and problems associated with the graduate attributes approach to engineering education and to propose some options for improving the system.


Arising from the push in higher education for quality assurance, accountability for outcomes and capability of graduates (Leathwood & Phillips, 2000), specifying a list of qualities or capabilities that graduates will attain provides a benchmark against which the performance of a higher education institution can be measured. As required by the Department of Education, Science and Training since 1998, most Australian higher education institutions identify a list of expected graduate attributes or outcomes, though, for many universities, statements of graduate attributes have historically been more rhetorical than real (Lister & Nouwens, 2004). Graduate attributes are typically expressed in terms of: a) discipline-specific attributes that relate to the particular program(s) the student is studying; and b) generic attributes that are common to all or most graduates. It has been suggested that it is the generic attributes that are the most important (Hager et al, 2002), perhaps because the discipline-specific body of knowledge is prone to obsolescence and will require continual renewal, and in the longer term, as graduates progress in their careers, they will become less involved in the details of their discipline and more reliant on their generic skills.

Although an apparently logical and natural response to a shift in higher education thinking and policy in the early 1990s, which saw a move away from inputs to a focus more on outcomes (Clanchy & Ballard, 1995), because of their important role in higher education, graduate attributes, particularly "generic attributes", warrant a closer inspection. Graduate attributes form a component of an on-going evolution of competency-based education and training that can be viewed as five separate phases commencing in the late 19th century (Lloyd et al, 2001). In fact, graduate attributes, particularly generic attributes, are not underpinned by a strong conceptual framework, and the efforts of universities to describe them, and university staff to teach them are characterised by a wide range of differing terminology, viewpoints and approaches (Barrie, 2004). Australian academics do not share a common understanding of the nature of generic attributes and how such outcomes might be achieved (Barrie, 2006). Despite a pervasive influence on recent policy developments in higher education, the evidence from the literature indicates that graduate attributes have generally been implemented only in limited ways, and viewed by many staff as a primarily managerially-driven curriculum reform agenda (Moore & Hough, 2005). The fact that the stated graduate attributes of many universities, and even many different professional program accrediting bodies, appear to be remarkably similar can lead many staff to cynically view these lists as rhetorical organisational posturing, rather than anything of substantive educational value (Moore & Hough, 2005). Another criticism of many identified graduate attributes is that they purport to imbue students with a range of knowledge, skills and attitudes that are not directly observable in the course of a program of study, or cannot be determined to be in evidence until some future period in the student's personal and/or professional life, leaving the university with a certification task that is logically and/ or practically impossible (Chanock, 2003). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Improving Outcomes-Based Engineering Education in Australia


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.