Immigration in Denmark and Norway: Protecting Culture or Protecting Rights?

By Moore, Harald F. | Scandinavian Studies, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview

Immigration in Denmark and Norway: Protecting Culture or Protecting Rights?


Moore, Harald F., Scandinavian Studies


DANES HAVE TRADITIONALLY been seen as a tolerant and liberal people who place importance and value on social cohesion and equality. This characteristic has been most evident in the country's smoothly functioning welfare state and the historical interest in global humanitarian issues. Yet Denmark has not escaped the notable and wide-spread rise of xenophobia and racism that began in the mid-1980s in Europe. Notably, this rise coincided with an increase in immigration and the proliferation of anti-refugee and anti-immigration sentiment from growing far-right factions that finally established itself within the Danish government (Wren 142). Norway too has been viewed as a tolerant and egalitarian society as demonstrated by the development of a strong welfare state and by its becoming the Scandinavian leader in global peacemaking and humanitarian aid. Yet Norway has also faced xenophobia and the rise of a far-right party in conjunction with a similar rise in immigration. There is a difference in attitude toward the far right, however, within Norwegian politics. Despite the popularity of the far fight and anti-immigrant Fremskrittsparti [Progress Party], a definite resistance from both the left- and right-leaning parties to any association with them--be it in joining to promote policy issues, or in forming government coalitions--can be observed. This attitude was exemplified in 1999 when the then Prime Minister Kjell Magne Bondevik of the right-leaning Christian Democratic Party was asked whether he would allow the Fremskrittsparti to influence policy on immigration in order to stay in power. He replied, "As a country with a Christian and humanitarian cultural heritage, we must take our part of the responsibility for these people, without bringing this into an internal political game over the national budget" (Hagelund, "The Importance of Being Good" 178).

HISTORIC PATTERNS

Notably typical roles have been reversed with regard to the governments of Norway and Denmark, and with regard to xenophobia, discrimination, and human rights. For example, Jews in Norway were prohibited from holding office in the Norwegian Parliament when independence was first declared in 1814; they also suffered anti-Semitic violence and employment discrimination. The Norwegian state repeatedly turned a blind eye when anti-Jewish signs began appearing around Norway in 1940, when the Norwegian police handed the occupying Nazis a list of Jews living in Norway, when Jewish identity cards were issued, and again when the Nazis began gathering them for transport to concentration camps (Friedman 327-9). At the time, Norway prohibited Jews from holding office in the Norwegian government, while Denmark's government by contrast outlawed all forms of racial and religious discrimination with punishments such as fines and imprisonment. Jews were also formally allowed to organize into official councils headed by rabbis who were selected by the state. During the Nazi occupation, the Danish police sanctioned special patrols of Jewish businesses, synagogues, and neighborhoods in order to provide heightened security and protection. Furthermore, when the Nazis suggested the creation of a Jewish Ghetto and proposed that Jews should wear the yellow Jewish star, King Christian himself threatened to move his palace to the ghetto and maintained that he would wear the yellow star as a sign of solidarity. Most significantly, Danish citizens with the tacit aid of the Danish government smuggled thousands of Jews out of German-occupied Denmark. Fewer than 5 percent of Danish Jews were arrested by the Nazis during the occupation (Friedman 320-5).

With these considerations in mind, how and why Denmark and Norway have struggled with the recent rise of immigrants to their respective countries--many of whom have arrived as asylum seekers or refugees--can be examined. Since the mid-1980s, an upsurge in popularity of the Fremskrittsparti in Norway and the parallel third consecutive term for Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen in Denmark, whose center-right Liberal Party relies heavily on a coalition with the far-right Konservative Folkeparti [Conservative People's Party], is revealing. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Immigration in Denmark and Norway: Protecting Culture or Protecting Rights?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.