Poetry Ring

By Strate, Lance; Winslow, Dale | ETC.: A Review of General Semantics, October 2010 | Go to article overview

Poetry Ring


Strate, Lance, Winslow, Dale, ETC.: A Review of General Semantics


Our theme this time is writing, and it is worthwhile to recall that poetry precedes the invention of writing, and there is a world of difference between poetry that is a product of oral composition within an oral tradition, and poetry that is composed with the aid of writing. Of course, there also are significant differences between poetry appearing in print and spoken word poetry, and between silent reading and reciting and, more-so, listening to its recitation. But the reciting of poetry is still a re-siting, a re-situating of what is primarily a literary form, which means that it is also a re-sighting, as literary forms are governed by the eye in addition to (and sometimes instead of) the ear. As a literary form, then, concern has often been directed to the writing process as it pertains to poetry, and to the process of reading and interpreting the poetic form. The literary scholar I. A. Richards, whose perspective on language and meaning was consistent with general semantics, devoted his 1929 study, Practical Criticism, to the problem of how individuals read and understand (or misunderstand) poetry. The problem, in part, has to do with the multiplicity of meaning:

  The all important fact for the study of literature--or any other mode
  of communication--is that there are several kinds of meaning. Whether
  we know and intend it or not, we are all jugglers when we converse,
  keeping the billiard-balls in the air while we balance the cue on our
  nose. Whether we are active, as in speech or writing, or passive, as
  readers or listeners, the Total Meaning we are engaged with is,
  almost always, a blend, a combination of several contributory
  meanings of different types. Language--and pre-eminently language as
  it is used in poetry--has not one but several tasks to perform
  simultaneously, and we shall misconceive most of the difficulties of
  criticism unless we understand this point and take note of the
  differences between these functions. (1)

The four functions Richards refers to are Sense (literal meaning), Feeling (emotional connotations), Tone (the source's attitude toward and relationship with the receiver), and Intention (the communicator's conscious or unconscious motives). But given that poetry poses special problems for the isomorphic sharing of meaning--a fact borne out by the research on reading reported in Practical Criticism--and that these problems are nowhere near as acute for other literary or linguistic forms, we might well ask, what is the purpose of poetry? Certainly, at one time poetry was a mnemonic medium, a means of augmenting the storage capacity of the brain and the time-binding ability of a society, a method for preserving knowledge by placing it in a memorable form. But that time has long since passed, and poetry has long since evolved from its roots as a form of mnemotechny employed by singers of tales. Perhaps we ought to retain the basic concept of poetry as language given memorable shape and form, but that does not seem sufficient for a modern understanding of poetry (let alone a postmodern one). One answer is supplied by Owen Barfield in a work published a year before Practical Criticism entitled Poetic Diction:

  An introspective analysis of my experience obliges me to say that
  appreciation of poetry involves a "felt change of consciousness." The
  phrase must be taken with some exactness. Appreciation takes place at
  the actual moment of change. It is not simply that the poet enables
  me to see with his eyes, and so to apprehend a larger and fuller
  world. He may indeed do this, as we shall see later; but the actual
  moment of the pleasure of appreciation depends upon something rarer
  and more transitory. It depends on the change itself. If I pass a
  coil of wire between the poles of a magnet, I generate in it an
  electric current--but I only do so while the coil is positively
  moving across the lines of force. I may leave the coil at rest
  between the two poles and in such a position that it is thoroughly
  permeated by the magnetic field; but in that case no current will
  flow along the conductor. … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Poetry Ring
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.