The Mammogram Hustle

By Integrity, Elizabeth Lucas Joe Eaton And David Donald Center | Newsweek, February 7, 2011 | Go to article overview

The Mammogram Hustle

Integrity, Elizabeth Lucas Joe Eaton And David Donald Center, Newsweek

There is no evidence digital mammograms improve cancer detection in older women. But thanks to political pressure, Medicare pays 65 percent more for them.

When patients at women's diagnostic of Texas began canceling their mammogram appointments in 2005, the staff had a good idea why. A Dallas hospital had recently put up a billboard beside the busy North Central Expressway announcing its new digital-mammography machine, and magazines and newspapers were full of ads for the devices, suggesting they were more effective at finding breast cancer than traditional film mammograms. So while the physicians at Women's Diagnostic were satisfied with film mammography, said Gerald Kolb, then chief knowledge officer at the clinic, once they began losing patients to the digital-mammography clinic they felt they had no choice. By 2006 they had replaced their film-mammography system with five digital units, for a total of $1.5 million. "We didn't want to spend the millions of dollars to make the conversion," Kolb says. "We had to."

Hospitals and clinics nationwide made the same calculation. They have spent billions buying digital-mammography units since 2000, when General Electric sold the first one in the U.S. Unfortunately, although the newer technology might be better at detecting breast tumors in younger women, it has not been proven to improve breast-cancer detection or health outcomes in women 65 and older, concluded a five-year study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and published in the journal Radiology in 2008. Yet despite the lack of evidence that digital mammograms are superior for older women, political pressure has forced Medicare to pay health-care providers more for them. That is one factor pushing more doctors to buy the digital systems and bill Medicare for their use, driving up health-care costs. "A lot of medical interventions have been oversold, and [digital mammography] is another one," says Dr. Russell Harris, a professor and preventive-medicine expert at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. "The people who make the machines, who benefit by selling newer machines, have triumphed."

That triumph has come at a steep cost to the nation's health-care budget and, possibly, to women's health. An analysis of six years of Medicare billing data obtained by the Center for Public Integrity and The Wall Street Journal shows that despite its lackluster performance, digital mammography has become the new standard of care for women 65 and older. In 2003, Medicare paid about 426,000 digital-mammogram claims to physicians, clinics, and hospitals--4 percent of the total. In 2008, the latest year analyzed by the center, that number rose to almost 6 million, nearly 53 percent of the total. The shift has been expensive: Medicare pays $129 for a digital mammogram, but $78 for a standard film mammogram (though that can vary by state). As more screening centers switched to digital mammograms, Medicare's additional outlays for breast-cancer screening totaled about $350 million over the span from 2003 to 2008, according to the center's sampling of Medicare data, adding to the budgetary pressure on a program that needs to shed costs to survive.

The rise of digital mammography is a tale of intense industry marketing, direct-to-consumer advertising, political lobbying, and strategic campaign donations to politicians who forced Medicare to pay more for digital mammograms than for film mammograms, creating the financial incentive for clinics and hospitals to replace film machines with digital ones.

GE says digital mammography has taken off because it's the better way to go. "The faster, more streamlined, and more efficient you can make the exam experience for patients," says GE spokeswoman Allison Cohen, "the more likely you are to get the screening, which leads to earlier diagnosis, which leads to survival."

In the mid-1990s, when imaging manufacturers began making their pitch to the Food and Drug Administration, breast-cancer advocates and scientists hoped the new technology would let radiologists identify cancers that remained invisible in film mammograms, improving early detection. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

The Mammogram Hustle


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.