The Supreme Court's Declining Plenary Docket: A Membership-Based Explanation

By Stras, David R. | Constitutional Commentary, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview

The Supreme Court's Declining Plenary Docket: A Membership-Based Explanation


Stras, David R., Constitutional Commentary


INTRODUCTION

The decline in the Supreme Court's plenary docket over the past thirty years has puzzled commentators. A number of hypotheses for the decline have been advanced in the scholarly literature, including the impact of the cert pool, (1) Congress's elimination of most of the Supreme Court's mandatory appellate jurisdiction, (2) greater homogeneity in the personnel of lower federal courts, (3) a reduction in the number of cases in which the United States has sought plenary review from the Court,(4) and changes in personnel on the Supreme Court. (5) Investigation of the latter hypothesis has been hampered by the limitations of available data, particularly for the Terms of the Supreme Court in which the most drastic declines in the plenary docket have occurred, such as from 1992 to 1993 when the number of opinions of the Court declined from 114 to 87, the greatest single-year percentage drop since the October 1953 Term of the Supreme Court. (6)

This Essay develops support for the hypothesis that changes in the Court's membership have contributed to the decline in the Supreme Court's plenary docket. The unique dataset contains the certiorari votes of all Justices for every case between October Term 1986 and October Term 1993 in which one or more Justices voted to grant certiorari or join three other Justices in doing so. (7) The data and figures in this Essay demonstrate that personnel changes have had an impact on the decline in the Supreme Court's plenary docket.

I. THE SHRINKING PLENARY DOCKET

The recent decline in the Supreme Court's plenary docket is extraordinary. The Court's plenary docket reached a modern high of 167 Opinions of the Court in October Term 1981, but has since declined to a modern low of 70 in October Term 2007, a 58% reduction in the number of cases decided by the Court. The transformation of the plenary docket coincides with a period of rapid personnel turnover on the Supreme Court. In contrast to the unprecedented lack of any turnover on the Supreme Court from October Term 1994 to October Term 2005, five new Justices joined the Court between 1986 and 1993. The following five personnel changes occurred: (1) Antonin Scalia for Warren Burger in 1986; (8) (2) Anthony Kennedy for Lewis Powell in 1987; (3) David Souter for William Brennan in 1990; (4) Clarence Thomas for Thurgood Marshall in 1991; and (5) Ruth Bader Ginsburg for Byron White in 1993. Given that the high turnover rate coincides perfectly with acceleration in the decline of the plenary docket, it is unsurprising that some scholars have speculated that membership changes have caused or at least contributed to the decline. (9) Indeed, in October Term 1986, the Court issued 152 Opinions of the Court, but by October Term 1993, that number had declined to just 87. Figure One graphically displays the trend.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

II. THE EFFECT OF CHANGING MEMBERSHIP

The most direct method of determining whether membership changes have contributed to the declining plenary docket is to look at the individual votes of Justices on a Term-by-Term basis. (10) Fortunately, Justice Harry Blackmun kept meticulous records, including docket sheets containing the certiorari votes for every Justice while he served on the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the Blackmun papers provide crucial voting information from the period of greatest decline in the plenary docket from 1986 to 1993.

Several limitations for the data must be recognized at the outset. First, although the individual votes of Justices are coded by docket number in the dataset, the aggregate data presented in this Essay do not indicate the types of cases on which certain Justices voted to grant certiorari. Peggy and Richard Cordray have noted, for example, that Justices Brennan and Marshall voted to grant review in a greater number of criminal cases in which the petitioner proceeded in forma pauperis. (11) In other words, the subtle nuances in aggregate voting patterns by each individual Justice are not captured in this Essay. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Supreme Court's Declining Plenary Docket: A Membership-Based Explanation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.