Eliminating Sports for Title IX Compliance

By Darnell, Claire; Petersen, Jeffrey | JOPERD--The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, February 2011 | Go to article overview

Eliminating Sports for Title IX Compliance


Darnell, Claire, Petersen, Jeffrey, JOPERD--The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance


Equity in Athletics v. Department of Education

675 F. Supp. 2d 660

2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121275

December 30, 2009

On September 29, 2006, James Madison University (JMU) decided to eliminate seven men's sports and three women's sports in an attempt to bring the university's varsity athletic program into compliance with Title IX. The university stated that the decision was based on the first part of Title IX's three-part test, which holds that the gender makeup of the university's athletic program must be "substantially proportionate" to that of the university's undergraduate enrollment. The university considered and analyzed alternatives but deemed any additional sports beyond the university's current total of 28 teams unacceptable. By cutting the ten teams, the gender makeup of JMU's athletic program would better match the current 61 percent female and 39 percent male student enrollment, compared to the student-athlete composition of 50.7 percent female and 49.3 percent male at the time before the proposed cuts.

Individuals opposed to the cuts formed Equity in Athletics, Inc. (EIA), and immediately filed action against the Department of Education, the Secretary of Education, the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, and the United States on March 19, 2007, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief that would void the allegedly unlawful guidelines and require new interpretations to be issued. At that time, EIA also requested that JMU defer the proposed eliminations until the challenge of the federal guidelines was complete. When JMU declined, EIA amended its complaint to include JMU and several affiliates as defendants on June 1, 2007, and filed a motion for preliminary injunction on June 15, 2007. The motion was ultimately denied, with the decision affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals.

Following a denied appeal to the United States Supreme Court, EIA filed a second amended complaint in U.S. District Court to protect athletic opportunities at federally funded Virginia colleges and universities from gender-based discrimination through implementation of Title IX. Equity in Athletics contended that the three-part test was discriminatory under four separate counts.

Discussion by the Court

In Count I, EIA challenged the validity of the three-part test, alleging that the test violates Title IX itself, the equal protection elements both of the Fourteenth Amendment and Fifth Amendment, along with the First Amendment, and the Spending Clause.

The plaintiffs contended that by allowing for the elimination of intercollegiate athletic opportunities in order to create opportunities proportionate to their respective enrollments, the three-part test authorizes universities to intentionally discriminate against males on the basis of gender. The court maintained that the policy does not require the elimination of programs because institutions can also satisfy the three-part test by fulfilling either of the two other prongs of the test. Elimination of athletic opportunities for the over-represented sex is not the only method by which Title IX compliance can be achieved.

The plaintiffs asserted that the use of the three-part test to eliminate several sports teams violated the associational protections of the First Amendment. However, the court noted that there is no generalized right of "social association" within a sport team. The associational protections of the First Amendment refer to intimate and expressive associations, while the interaction that occurs in a team setting is not considered a protected right.

Equity in Athletics alleged that the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution does not "authorize the federal defendants to impose coercive conditions" and that the federal defendants are not authorized to impose requirements on programs that are not directly receiving federal funds. The court held that the Spending Clause as associated with Title IX is of the same nature as a contract: in order to receive federal funds, the recipients agree to comply with federal regulations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Eliminating Sports for Title IX Compliance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.