Drama at Taylor's Trial

By Boateng, Osei | New African, March 2011 | Go to article overview

Drama at Taylor's Trial


Boateng, Osei, New African


As Charles Taylor's trial at the Special Court for Sierra Leone draws to a close, an epic drama has erupted thanks to the contents of two leaked US embassy cables published by the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks. The two cables appear to suggest that Washington is driving the Court towards "putting Taylor away for a long time". This has forced Taylor's defence team to file an urgent motion asking the Court to clear the air about its independence and impartiality, before the trial comes to a close. Osei Boateng reports.

When your master is your enemy, you are doomed, said Charles Taylor, the former Liberian president currently standing trial at the Special Court for Sierra Leone, in June 2002. Since his arrest in March 2006, Taylor has maintained that his troubles have been driven by America, supported by Britain. But not many people believed him. Now, two US embassy cables leaked by the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks, appear to support Taylor's assertion. This has compelled his defence team to file a last-minute "urgent" motion seeking clarification from the Court that it has not been influenced by outside forces, particularly the American government, to convict Taylor by all means, fair or foul; and that the Court's impartiality and independence have not been compromised.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The cables, one from the US embassy in the Liberian capital, Monrovia, and the other from the US embassy in The Hague, appear to suggest that the American government is interfering and driving the Court towards "putting Taylor away for a long time".

Because the motion and five other outstanding ones had not been decided upon by the Trial and Appeal Chambers of the Court, by 14 January, Taylor refused to file his "final trial brief" to wrap up his defence, as ordered by the Court on 22 October last year.

But by a majority decision of 2-1 (one of the three judges on the case, the Ugandan Justice Julia Sebutinde, dissented), the Court ruled that Taylor would not be allowed to run the trial as he pleased, and that by failing to meet the 14 January deadline, he had effectively forfeited his chance to file his "final trial brief", a critical document that encapsulates a party's strongest argument, based on the facts and evidence before the Court. The final trial brief is intended to assist the judges in writing their judgements.

When both the Trial and Appeals Chambers finally handed down their decisions on the outstanding motions on 3 February (some of which went in Taylor's favour), Taylor filed his "final trial brief", but again, by a majority decision of 2-1 (with Justice Sebutinde again dissenting), the Court refused to accept the brief as filed even though Rule 86(B) of the Statute establishing the Court allowed the filing of the brief "not later than five days prior to the date set for the presentation of that party's final argument."

The refusal really annoyed Taylor's lead defence counsel, Courtenay Griffiths, so much so that he walked out of the Court in protest, despite being told to sit down by the presiding judge, Justice Teresa Doherty (from Northern Ireland). He was later followed out by his client, Taylor.

On 9 February, the Court ruled (again by majority decision, with Justice Sebutinde again dissenting), that Griffiths should attend court on 11 February to apologise for his behaviour on 8 February or the Court would impose sanctions against him.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

When the Court sat on 11 February to hear the apology, the Defence offered none but managed to get an adjournment for two weeks (until 25 February) to get an experienced lawyer to defend Griffiths on the disciplinary case.

On top of that, the Defence got a favourable majority decision (this time with Justice Richard Lussick of Samoa dissenting) for leave to appeal against the Trial Chamber's decision to refuse Taylor's final trial brief. The Court therefore adjourned the substantive Taylor case until the Appeals Chamber decides on the Defence's appeal to be allowed to file the "final trial brief". …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Drama at Taylor's Trial
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.