American Foreign Policy Council Presents ... Sino-Indian Relations: A Troubled History, an Uncertain Future

By Smith, Jeff M. | Harvard International Review, Spring 2011 | Go to article overview

American Foreign Policy Council Presents ... Sino-Indian Relations: A Troubled History, an Uncertain Future


Smith, Jeff M., Harvard International Review


Few now dispute that the magnificent rise of China and India has fundamentally transformed the geopolitical landscape of the 21st century. In the United States, their emergence has prompted interest in the two Asian giants, home to more than a third of the world's population, with a focus on how their geopolitical influence will affect the United States. The Washington foreign policy community has framed China as a challenge and a competitor, while India is increasingly portrayed as an opportunity and an ally. Yet while the heightened focus on Sino-US and Indo-US relations is welcome, few US analysts have bothered to examine the third, and perhaps most volatile, leg of this equation: the Sino-Indian relationship.

History is littered with examples of rising powers upending the status quo and challenging the established order. Strategic thinkers in the United States have mulled the potential of conflict with China since the moment the Soviet Union collapsed. However, it is at least as likely that if superpower conflict does emerge in the 21st century, it will be between China and India. This scenario is by no means guaranteed, and perhaps not even probable. Formal relations are cordial. However, unlike the United States and China, the two do not have the luxury of a vast ocean to separate them. Rather, they share a long and, more importantly, contested border and a close proximity that can magnify grievances, encourage friction, and perpetuate a zero-sum mentality. It is therefore incumbent upon the United States to seek a greater understanding of Sino-Indian relations, particularly of the issues that divide them and the historical context that underpins their interactions.

A Relationship that Starts with War

A convenient starting point for analyzing contemporary Sino-Indian relations is their birth as modern nations only two years apart: India, when it gained independence from Britain in 1947, and Communist China, when Mao Zedong and his Red Guards declared victory in the Chinese civil war in 1949. Drawn together by anti-imperialist sentiment and Asian fraternity, the two nations enjoyed something of a Golden Age throughout their first decade as independent countries, a period often characterized by a popular phrase of the time: "Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai," or "Indians and Chinese are brothers." In 1954, the two signed the "Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence," or Panchsheel, which codified the principles of mutual non-aggression and non-interference.

However, the era of Sino-Indian harmony would last only a few short years. China's invasion and annexation of Tibet in 1950 had already made more than a few Indians uncomfortable, but at the time, India's leaders quieted voices of protest in the interest of bilateral comity. However, when the Dalai Lama led a failed uprising against Chinese rule in 1959, India was intimately drawn into what China considered an internal conflict. With his rebellion crushed, the Dalai Lama and his beleaguered followers fled into northern India seeking safe haven, and New Delhi, to the great frustration of Beijing, granted it.

Adding fuel to the fire, as the Dalai Lama episode was unfolding, both India and China began a dangerous game of brinksmanship along their poorly demarcated 2,100 mile-long border. In 1958, India discovered that Chinese workers had built a strategically placed road through territory claimed by both sides along India's northwestern border with China. The precise border in Aksai Chin, as this 15,000 square mile portion of desolate Tibetan plateau is called, had become a matter of contention between British-ruled India and China since the late 1914 century. In India's northeast, there was a major controversy as well. There, India claimed its border with China extended to the McMahon line, a boundary drawn by India's British overlords in 1914, whereas China laid claim to 32,000 square miles of territory south of that line, which the Chinese refer to as South Tibet. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

American Foreign Policy Council Presents ... Sino-Indian Relations: A Troubled History, an Uncertain Future
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.