Corporate Law - Principal's Liability for Agent's Conduct - New York Court of Appeals Clarifies Standard for Imputability of an Agent's Fraudulent Conduct to Its Principal in the Context of an in Pari Delicto Defense - Kirschner V. KPMG LLP

Harvard Law Review, May 2011 | Go to article overview

Corporate Law - Principal's Liability for Agent's Conduct - New York Court of Appeals Clarifies Standard for Imputability of an Agent's Fraudulent Conduct to Its Principal in the Context of an in Pari Delicto Defense - Kirschner V. KPMG LLP


The common law of agency has long played a fundamental role in a wide range of business transactions. However, in the era of complex organizational structures and the outsourcing of core operations, the adaptability of that law to modern corporate realities is being put to the test. Doctrines like imputation, which under certain circumstances attributes the actions of an agent to its principal, (1) and in pari delicto, an equitable defense that prevents recovery by one party against another where both bear responsibility for the wrongdoing at issue, (2) can now combine to produce undesirable results. Accounting firms, law firms, and other providers of professional services--often referred to as "gatekeepers" (3)--have employed these principles in tandem to defend against suits by their corporate clients. Typically gatekeepers raise such a defense against claims that they either conspired to commit fraud with or negligently failed to discover fraud by a client to the detriment of that client's shareholders, creditors, or both. (4) Recently, in Kirschner v. KPMG LLP (5) (Kirschner), the New York Court of Appeals determined that, as a matter of New York law, a corporation defrauded by its managers may not recover from its gatekeepers who either participated in the fraud or negligently failed to detect it. (6) While the Court of Appeals was correct to consider how its decision would influence the incentives of corporate actors and deter wrongdoing generally, it failed to account adequately for how these considerations might differ when applied in the context of a large, publicly traded corporation.

Kirschner disposed of questions of state law certified to the New York Court of Appeals with respect to two underlying cases: Kirschner v. KPMG LLP (7) (Kirschner II), and Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. (8) In Kirschner II, Refco, a publicly traded financial services firm, declared bankruptcy after disclosing that its controlling shareholder-officers had concealed Refco's uncollectible receivables by fraudulently manipulating the firm's balance sheet for several years. (9) A court-established litigation trust subsequently sued several parties on Refco's behalf, including the firm's senior management, as well as a law firm and three accounting firms that allegedly had either assisted Refco managers in perpetrating the fraud or negligently failed to uncover it. (10) In Teachers' Retirement System, two stockholders of insurance and financial services giant AIG brought a derivative action against the company's independent auditor. The derivative plaintiffs alleged that, among other illegal actions, senior AIG officials fraudulently misled investors into believing that the corporation was worth billions of dollars more than it actually was worth at the time. (11) As for PricewaterhouseCoopers's role in the fraud, the plaintiffs claimed that the firm would have detected the scheme but for its negligent "fail[ure] to perform its auditing responsibilities in accordance with professional standards of conduct." (12)

In both underlying cases, the trial courts determined that, under New York law, (13) in pari delicto barred the plaintiffs' claims against both corporations' gatekeepers. Both courts noted--without dispute from the litigants--the general presumption that the actions and knowledge of an agent within the scope of the agency relationship are imputed to the principal. (14) Thus, if the fraudulent acts of Refco's and AIG's officers were attributable to their respective employers, in pari delicto would prohibit recovery. However, the Teachers' Retirement System plaintiffs argued that imputation should not apply because they had established the applicability of New York's "adverse interest" exception to imputation--an exception that applies when "the agent [has] totally abandoned his principal's interests and [is] acting entirely for his own or another's purposes." (15) Both trial courts found that the exception did not apply, (16) and the plaintiffs appealed. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Corporate Law - Principal's Liability for Agent's Conduct - New York Court of Appeals Clarifies Standard for Imputability of an Agent's Fraudulent Conduct to Its Principal in the Context of an in Pari Delicto Defense - Kirschner V. KPMG LLP
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.