Calibrated Seismic Verification of the Threshold Test Ban Treaty

By Picard, Richard; Bryson, Maurice | Journal of the American Statistical Association, June 1992 | Go to article overview

Calibrated Seismic Verification of the Threshold Test Ban Treaty


Picard, Richard, Bryson, Maurice, Journal of the American Statistical Association


1. BACKGROUND

Since 1976 nuclear weapons tests conducted by the United States and Soviet Union have been limited by the Threshold Test Ban Treaty (TTBT) to a maximum yield of 150 kilotons (kt). This agreement aimed to restrain development of first-strike weapons. Verification was to be provided by "national technical means," based primarily on interpretation of seismic data (U.S. Dept. of State 1986). Monitoring procedures requiring on-site presence would have been difficult to negotiate at the time (Greb and Heckrotte 1983) and were not pursued.

The TTBT's original protocol provided for the United States and Soviet Union to exchange descriptions of their test areas' geologies as well as other data, including yields of "two nuclear weapon tests for calibration purposes from each geophysically distinct testing area where underground nuclear weapon tests have been and are to be conducted" (Dahlman and Israelson 1977, p. 367). In principle, such an information exchange would facilitate calibration of algorithms used to interpret seismic magnitudes; in practice, there is understandably some reluctance to accept unvalidated data. Largely because of verification concerns, the TTBT was not promptly ratified by the U.S., and the exchange did not take place.

An alternative approach to verification favored by the Reagan administration advocated using on-site instrumentation known as CORRTEX for all nuclear tests designed to exceed a specified yield level. Using this instrumentation, yield is inferred hydrodynamically through direct measurement of the explosion's shock front. Widely described (e.g., Reagan 1987) as having a 30% estimation error, CORRTEX became accepted as a de facto U.S. standard for effective TTBT verification. As a matter of official U.S. policy, seismic monitoring came to have less importance.

This policy appeared to change in 1989. Following a meeting of U.S. Secretary of State Baker and Soviet Foreign Minister Shevardnadze came the statement;

  The Secretary and the Foreign Minister ... reached agreement to
  incorporate hydrodynamic and seismic monitoring, as well as on-site
  inspection, into the verification protocol for the 1974 Threshold
  Test Ban Treaty, as well as the levels above which these measurements
  would occur. In order to obtain a statistically significant number of
  data points to improve the national technical means of each side,
  each side will guarantee the other side the right to make on-site
  hydrodynamic yield measurements of at least two tests per year during
  the first five years following ratification of this treaty. After
  five years, each side shall guarantee one such hydrodynamic
  measurement a year thereafter ... (U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament
  Agency 1989).

Not only would on-site measurements verify TTBT compliance, but the resulting data base could aid in calibrating a seismic monitoring system.

A new protocol, completed in early 1990, called for hydrodynamic measurements of tests designed to exceed 50 kt and for the aforementioned two-test-per-year minimum. These provisions, and others permitting in-country seismic monitoring, allowed subsequent ratification of the TTBT.

More recently, an attempted military coup in the Soviet Union sought to change the course of world events, but failed. Not long thereafter, the "Soviet Union" ceased to exist and its TTBT responsibilities were assumed by the Russian republic, which sent scientists to the Nevada Test Site to exercise treaty rights and temporarily suspended its own nuclear testing. Still other events with implications for arms control and verification may have occurred between the time of this writing and the publication of this article.

The future role of seismic monitoring vis-a-vis on-site measurement is difficult to fully characterize. For example, it is conceivable that the developing concern with nuclear proliferation could expand the targets of a monitoring system beyond the United States and Russia. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Calibrated Seismic Verification of the Threshold Test Ban Treaty
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.