Social Construction and Deconstruction of a 'Theocracy'

By Goonatilake, Susantha | Antiquity, September 2011 | Go to article overview

Social Construction and Deconstruction of a 'Theocracy'

Goonatilake, Susantha, Antiquity

Archaeology aims at imagining past societies, using physical data together with, if available, historical documentation. Bur this imaginative process is bound by factors widely discussed in social epistemology, including unequal social relations among researchers. Such unequal geopolitics in knowledge has been explored by the present author and others (Goonatilake 1982, 1984, 1999, 2001; Clough 2001).

The present exercise aims to investigate and question the social and intellectual context in which Anuradhapura, the first capital in Sri Lanka, has been interpreted as belonging to a 'theocracy' (Coningham et al. 2007). Prehistoric archaeology has dated the site to around the ninth century BC at which time it was one of the largest cities in South Asia. A continuous set of chronicles, authenticated by physical remains, document the continuation of the city from at least the fourth/third century BC up to the eleventh century AD, when it was sacked by south Indian invaders. The written evidence includes Sinhalese chronicles (written in Pali), descriptions of the city by foreign travellers and a large number of inscriptions dating back to the third century BC. This documentation describes the secular roles of personages such as kings and ministers. Although there is of course a strong monastic presence, the monasteries were known as centres of both religious and secular learning. In spite of this, Coningham et al. argue, mainly from archaeological evidence, that Anuradhapura was a 'theocracy', a heavily loaded word with connotations that are inappropriate for Anuradhapura.

The theocracy thesis of Coningham

Anuradhapura was the Sri Lankan capital for 1500 years. It featured monasteries and lakes and attracted merchants engaged in the Indian Ocean trade. Coningham excavated in the city for a number of years, noting a 'huge volume' of exotic and imported material found within the city, giving an 'extremely rich artefactual sequence' which allowed the development of Indian Ocean networks of trade from early times to Anuradhapura's abandonment in the eleventh century (Coningham et al. 2007: 703).

In 2003 he turned his attention to Anuradhapura's hinterland, mapping sites that appeared on the surface. As a result of the first three seasons, he advances 'a number of working hypotheses' about the relationship between the town and the rural settlements that surrounded it (p. 713). He proposes a major administrative role for the monasteries, and interpreted them as belonging to a self-regulating hierarchy (p. 717). He finds analogies in the hydraulic and irrigation systems with Khmer polities, and in the distribution and size of the stupas (commemorative monuments) with the Maya pyramids (p. 716). Citing only a Western authority he states that 'most South Asian Early Historic states are considered to be almost theocratic in their political and economic structure' (p. 714-5). This no doubt encouraged him to designate the Anuradhapura hinterland as functioning as a 'theocratic landscape' for the majority of the period under analysis (i.e. 500 BC to AD 1000) (p. 717).

Coningham does attempt to compare and contrast his findings with the written record. He mentions the existence of a corpus of inscriptions dating from the third century BC to the first century AD which describe a large number of officials within the kingdom. He notes that records of donations in temples include those with titles of army commander, treasurer, minister, administrator, chief, village headman, and head of a household. He finds evidence of metalworkers and stonemasons indirectly indicating the existence of social groups around these activities. He also notes a tax regime and references to revenue officers supporting the state administration. Revenues went both to the secular system and to the sangha--the Buddhist monks' institution. He also makes theoretical recourse to the Indian text, Arthasastra of Kautiliya (originally assigned to around the fourth century BC, but probably in its current text dated to the second to fourth centuries AD [Mabbett 1964; Trautmann 1971: 10]) to describe what he claims is a template of South Asian cities which gives different hierarchies of an ideal kingdom, concluding that the categories of sites he defines in the hinterland do not correspond with the contemporary settlement hierarchy advocated in the Arthasastra. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Social Construction and Deconstruction of a 'Theocracy'


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.