Three Keys to the City: Resources, Agglomeration Economies, and Sorting

By Carlino, Gerald A. | Business Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia), Fall 2011 | Go to article overview

Three Keys to the City: Resources, Agglomeration Economies, and Sorting


Carlino, Gerald A., Business Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia)


Although metropolitan areas account for only 16 percent of the total land area in the United States, they contain almost 80 percent of the nation's population and nearly 85 percent of its jobs. This high degree of spatial concentration of people and jobs leads to congestion costs, such as increased traffic and pollution, and higher housing costs. To offset these congestion costs, workers must receive higher wages, and higher wages increase firms' costs.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

So why do firms continue to produce in cities where the cost of doing business is so high? Economists offer three main explanations. (1) The first explanation is that cities developed and grew because of some valuable natural advantage, such as a source of raw materials or a port that allowed businesses to save on transportation costs. For example, because of its access to a deep harbor and because of its central location, Philadelphia was the largest and most important trading and merchant center in North America during the nation's colonial period.

But, as Satyajit Chatterjee points out in an earlier Business Review article, a natural advantage, such as a harbor, was not the main reason for Philadelphia's subsequent growth into the fourth largest metropolitan area in the country. As colonial Philadelphia grew, the resulting concentration of people and jobs led to efficiency gains and cost savings for firms, efficiency and savings that arose from being close to suppliers, workers, customers, and even competitors. This second reason for cost savings in cities is referred to as agglomeration economies. Finally, as Joseph Gyourko points out, the early growth of Philadelphia was aided by its large and relatively highly skilled labor force. The presence of a talented and flexible labor force made it feasible for entrepreneurs to start new businesses in Philadelphia. This third reason for the growth of cities is called sorting: A disproportionate share of highly skilled (more productive) workers choose to live in large cities, making big cities more productive than small ones. Other things equal, firms will have little incentive to move if congestion costs are balanced by the benefits of a natural advantage, agglomeration economies, and sorting.

At one time, economists tended to lump together the advantages of sorting and the advantages associated with urban agglomeration economies into a single measure. However, more recently, economists have examined how important each of the three reasons is in accounting for city productivity. Knowledge about the relative importance of each of the reasons is important to policymakers, too. If agglomeration economies kick in once a city reaches a critical size, urban planners might want to pursue policies that help a city reach that size. There is also mounting evidence that agglomeration economies depend on a city's ability to attract and retain high-skill workers. Edward Glaeser and Matthew Resseger find that agglomeration economies are much stronger in cities where workers are relatively highly skilled. Given the evidence that a high concentration of skilled workers enhances city productivity, policymakers may want to consider policies that attract and retain highly skilled people.

In this article I will look at recent developments in measuring each of the sources of city productivity and discuss the policy implications of this research.

SPATIAL CONCENTRATION OF PEOPLE AND JOBS IN CITIES: ROLE OF NATURAL ADVANTAGE, AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES, AND SORTING

A location may attract households and firms because of the presence of valuable natural resources, such as petroleum, coal, lumber, or minerals, and proximity to a navigable river or a port. Although the availability of resources and other natural advantages varies from place to place, a diversity of resources cannot be the main reason for the existence of cities. According to Edward Glaeser and Janet Kohlhase, "The cost of moving a ton by rail has declined in real terms by more than 90 percent since the late 19th century and the rise in trucking has been even more dramatic. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Three Keys to the City: Resources, Agglomeration Economies, and Sorting
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.