China and East Asia on the World Stage

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law, Annual 2010 | Go to article overview

China and East Asia on the World Stage


This panel was convened at 9:00 a.m., Saturday, March 27, by its moderator, Julia Ya Qin of Wayne State University, who introduced the panelists: Deborah Brautigam of American University's School of International Service; * Henry Gao of Singapore Management University; Saadia Pekkanen of the University of Washington's Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies; and Edmund Sim of Appleton Luff PTE LTD. ([dagger])

* Deborah Brautigam was unable to contribute remarks for the Proceedings.

([dagger]) Edmund Sim did not submit remarks for the Proceedings.

THE SOCIALIZATION OF CHINA, JAPAN, AND KOREA (CJK) IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: ASSESSMENT AND IMPLICATIONS

I am presenting a jointly authored paper, in which my coauthors (Henry Gao and Dukgeun Ahn) and I are examining and reassessing the behavior of the dominant powers in Asia, specifically China, Japan, and South Korea, in the system of international economic law.1 Put simply, our contention is that in terms of their involvement and engagement with international economic law these countries have moved toward an orientation that can best be described as aggressive legalism. By this we mean that we are looking at a moving picture in which they have significantly increased their emphasis on the precision of, obligation to, and delegation based on stable transnational rules in economic relations. In our collective judgment, this newer orientation, which remains under-appreciated, is not so much a game of numbers--how many cases are filed, or are won and lost, which is to be sure important in its own way--but rather a change in the orientation in terms of the uses and interplay of international economic law involving their foreign trade relations.

Increasingly, the public and private actors in these countries are consciously, and often times determinedly, using legal rules to affect outcomes involving their foreign economic relations. The socialization of these actors into the system of international economic law-and from there their efforts to taking, making, and shaping rules---demand cohesive theoretical and empirical attention. This is all the more important in an era in which we see the increasing spread and scope of international rules governing almost all activities (i.e., goods, services, intellectual property, investment, and so on) in the global and also regional Asian economy. What these Asian countries do, and the ways in which they decide to do it, has important consequences for the global as well as regional economies and its institutional underpinnings.

Our present work and emphasis on aggressive legalism in these countries' behavior comes out of a long trajectory of thinking and writing over the past decade in which each of us worked separately to understand the behavior of these major economic players, particularly with the formation of the WTO in 1995. (2) Separately, we came to roughly similar conclusions about the shift in orientation in these countries, which went against the conventional wisdom about the legal identity of a region with countries indifferent to the forces of international economic law.

What we found is that aggressive legalism was spreading not just in terms of litigation in the WTO, but on a variety of different dimensions, across numerous forums, and in convoluted ways that were not exactly obvious at first blush and that may be even more consequential for embedding the language of the law in economic relations. We are not suggesting that all this is linear or systematic; rather as with the evolution of any system of functioning and cohesive international economic law, the process is disjointed and discursive, sometimes visible and other times less so. Our goal in our larger project is thus to examine and analyze various dimensions, issues, forums, and ways focusing on the comparative behavior of these three economic powers. Concretely all this means that we look beyond litigation and also beyond the WTO to also include other legalized forums, legal institutions, rule-based negotiations, rule-invocation, and also rule-making as measures of the phenomenon of interest to us. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

China and East Asia on the World Stage
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.