Gauging the Use of Academic Science Libraries: Using a Variety of Assessment Tools, Science Librarians at a Public University Compiled Data Supporting the Consolidation of Collections and Services into Interdisciplinary Spaces

By Bardeen, Angela; Haefele, Chad et al. | Information Outlook, September 2011 | Go to article overview

Gauging the Use of Academic Science Libraries: Using a Variety of Assessment Tools, Science Librarians at a Public University Compiled Data Supporting the Consolidation of Collections and Services into Interdisciplinary Spaces


Bardeen, Angela, Haefele, Chad, Kamarei, Zahra, Romito, David, Sessoms, Pam, Swogger, Susan, Vargha, Rebecca B., Vaughan, K. T., Information Outlook


In October 2010, the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) formed a Task Force on Science Libraries and Collections to investigate how library services for the sciences are provided and how science collections are built on the campus. The task force, which comprised the authors of this article, was charged with providing recommendations on current and future needs in both of these areas. The impetus for this project included (1) the fact that scientific literature increasingly is available in electronic form, (2) questions about the way scientists approach literature research, and (3) budget constraints.

Due to environmental demands, the task force's timeline was greatly accelerated, and a deadline of February 2011 was established. Over the course of four months, the task force reviewed the literature, performed an extensive environmental scan and peer comparison, created and administered a survey of faculty and graduate students, and conducted focus groups with graduate and undergraduate students. We hope others going through similar processes may benefit from our experience.

Reviewing the Literature

We started by surveying the literature, which showed that the landscape of academic science libraries has shifted significantly over the last 20 years. The return on investment (ROI) calculations for resources such as staffing, space and collections/services have become even more important during budgetary downturns and recessions. The literature on science library consolidations clearly indicates that this perception of a "new normal" is far from new.

In 1999, the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) surveyed 122 member libraries and used the results to develop guidelines and standards for branch libraries in academic institutions and to compile a SPEC Kit (ACRL 1999). The objective was to answer the quintessential question of centralized or decentralized services and collections in academic branch libraries. These guidelines helped inform our own study.

Also in 1999, Jean A. Poland wrote an article describing the centralization of the engineering, mathematics and physical sciences libraries at Cornell University (Poland 1999). Six years later, Andrea Twiss-Brooks wrote an article about the closure of the University of Chicago Chemistry Library (Twiss-Brooks 2005). She described specific factors that produced a "tipping point" that preceded the closing of the library, which was almost 100 years old.

These sources revealed that the most common reasons for consolidation included the need to cut costs, changes in higher education, and declining foot traffic in libraries. The trend toward embedded librarians in academe and the rise of digital content in libraries are creating a paradigm shift for science libraries in academic settings, which the literature consistently reflects.

Scanning the Environment: Our Own Populations

Our charge was to investigate library services and collections for the sciences, making it necessary to define and describe the sciences as they exist at UNC. This was more complex than simply looking at the names of each of the science libraries--there are many different groups that use each library, each with its own needs, purposes, and requirements. We needed to develop a complete roster of the different user groups before we could even begin to seek out direct user feedback.

The sciences at UNC are distributed among the College of Arts & Sciences and five health sciences schools. Though we were focusing on the four branch science libraries, the interdisciplinary nature of much science research meant that many health sciences users might also be regular users of the science libraries, and vice versa. To account for this, we made a list of each of the basic science departments in the health sciences as well as the science departments in the College of Arts & Sciences. We used this list to define and recruit the focus groups and develop the surveys that provided feedback about the science libraries. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Gauging the Use of Academic Science Libraries: Using a Variety of Assessment Tools, Science Librarians at a Public University Compiled Data Supporting the Consolidation of Collections and Services into Interdisciplinary Spaces
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.