Incentives for Conservation Easements: The Charitable Deduction or a Better Way

By Halperin, Daniel | Law and Contemporary Problems, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview

Incentives for Conservation Easements: The Charitable Deduction or a Better Way


Halperin, Daniel, Law and Contemporary Problems


I

INTRODUCTION

The Internal Revenue Code allows a charitable income-tax deduction for a "qualified conservation contribution," (1) known, more colloquially, as a conservation easement. To be eligible for the deduction, the easement must be "granted in perpetuity" to a "qualified organization, exclusively for conservation purposes." (2) The 1980 change in the tax law to codify this deduction is generally recognized as being the factor largely responsible for the tremendous growth in the donation of conservation easements. (3) The Land Trust Alliance, an umbrella organization for land trusts, (like other defenders of the tax deduction) has pointed to the millions of acres now protected by conservation easements as evidence of the tax-expenditure program's enormous success? What is striking, however, is that supporters make no mention of the program's cost.

This article presents a discussion of tax-policy concerns relating to the charitable deduction for conservation easement donations. The deduction is unique in a number of ways. First, since 1969, the Internal Revenue Code has generally denied the deduction for a gift of a partial property interest. (5) The conflict of interest between charity and other owners raises a concern that the charitable deduction would not reflect the ultimate charitable benefit. The deduction for conservation easements is the principal exception to this rule (6) despite the significant potential for abuse and the distinct possibility that the public benefit may be less than anticipated. Moreover, the few other exceptions are either narrower or more carefully circumscribed.

Second, since 2006, the limitation on the deduction for a qualified conservation contribution is, at least temporarily, (7) uniquely high. In contrast to the deduction for other appreciated property, which is limited to thirty percent of the so-called contribution base, (8) the deduction limit for a qualified conservation contribution is generally fifty percent of the contribution base. (9) In the case of certain contributions from persons earning more than fifty percent of their gross income from farming or ranching, the limit is increased to one hundred percent. (10) Further, instead of the normal carryover of five years for unused contributions, the carryover for these contributions is extended to fifteen years. (11) In addition, the taxable value of land for estate-tax purposes can be reduced by as much as $500,000 for up to forty percent of the value of land subject to a conservation easement, in addition to any value reduction from the effect of the easement itself. (12) These provisions are extraordinary. It is unlikely many would believe that this charitable purpose should be elevated above all others.

Although I have previously written on the charitable deduction, (13) I am not an expert on conservation easements. I have been invited to participate in this symposium, and at earlier conferences at the Lincoln Institute (14) and the Harvard Law School, (15) because reporters at the Philadelphia Inquirer. (16) discovered testimony I had delivered on behalf of the Treasury back in 1979 and 1980. (17) My testimony had raised serious concerns about allowing the charitable deduction for conservation easement contributions.

The Treasury was troubled by the possibility of overvaluation of conservation easements and the difficulty of accurately valuing such partial interests in land. The Treasury believed that the proposed legislation failed to provide a sufficiently precise definition of conservation purposes and thus did not insure that deductible contributions would be confined to those providing some benefit to the general public. The Treasury was also concerned because the proposed legislation did not guarantee that the perpetual easements would be enforced over the long term. The professional tax staffs of the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee expressed similar reservations in 2005, (18) indicating that the problems the Treasury had identified in 1979 and 1980 remain. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Incentives for Conservation Easements: The Charitable Deduction or a Better Way
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.