Should We Follow the Gospel of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (CTH)?

By Groves, Matthew | Melbourne University Law Review, December 2010 | Go to article overview

Should We Follow the Gospel of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (CTH)?


Groves, Matthew, Melbourne University Law Review


[The Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review Act) 1977 (Cth) marked a radical reform of judicial review of administrative action in Australia. The Act introduced a statutory procedure for judicial review which was designed to provide a better alternative to judicial review at common law. The Act simplified the procedure for judicial review applications, codified the grounds of review and introduced important new rights such as the right to reasons for decisions amenable to review under the Act. In the first decade or so of its operation, the Act became the primary vehicle for judicial review at the federal level It also served as a model for reform for several states and territories, which enacted judicial review statutes that were based closely on the federal statute. This article examines why the influence of the Act has faltered in recent years. It concludes that some parts of the Act should be radically reformed, so that statutory judicial review at the federal level may. once again provide the simple and attractive avenues of review that were its original purpose.]

CONTENTS

I    Introduction
II   The Structure and Operation of the ADJR Act
III  The Scope of the ADJR Act
        A The Jurisdictional Formula of the ADJR Act
             1 'Decisions' and 'Conduct'
             2 'Administrative Character'
             3 'Under an Enactment'
        B Reforming the Jurisdictional Formula of the ADJR Act
        C The Exclusion of Vice-Regal Decisions from the ADJR Act
        D Other Exclusions from the ADJR Act--Schedule 1
        E A Possible State Innovation to the Scope of the ADJR Act Model
IV   The Codified Grounds of Review under the ADJR Act
V    Should the ADJR Act Have an Express Statutory Purpose or Guiding
     Principle?
VI   The Remedial Powers Granted by the ADJR Act
VII  State and Territory Versions of the ADJR Act and the Value of
     Uniformity
VIII Should Judicial Review Be Codified?
IX   Concluding Observations

1 INTRODUCTION

The enactment of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ('ADJR Act') was an important milestone in the evolution of Australian administrative law. The ADJR Act was a central part of a series of sweeping reforms to administrative law at the federal level and a remarkable reform in its own right. The ADJR Act was the first Australian attempt to codify both the law and much of the procedure of judicial review in Australia. The Act introduced a unified and single test for standing and a right to reasons for decisions, codified the grounds of judicial review and contained a simple provision governing remedies. This new statutory avenue of judicial review provided a vastly simpler alternative to judicial review at common law and was for many years regarded as a great success.

One measure of the success of the ADJR Act was the influence it exerted over the law of the states and territories. A version of the Act was adopted without substantial modifications in the Australian Capital Territory, Queensland and Tasmania. (1) But the spread of the ADJR Act faltered. The introduction of ADJR Act-style legislation was proposed but ultimately rejected in Victoria in 1999 (2) and Western Australia in 2002. (3) The adoption of any form of judicial review statute has never been publicly advocated by the governments or law reform agencies of New South Wales, South Australia or the Northern Territory. (4)

On the 25th anniversary of the report (5) that led to the introduction of the reforms to administrative law, including the ADJR Act, Lindsay Curtis noted the 'comparative failure of the gospel of the new administrative law to take root in other jurisdictions.' (6) That comment implied that the ADJR Act was a desirable reform that has since lost its sheen, though it shed little light on the reasons why that might be the case. This article examines the operation of the ADJR Act and considers whether a statute of the same nature should be adopted in those Australian jurisdictions that do not have a judicial review statute. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Should We Follow the Gospel of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (CTH)?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.