Disclosing the Abortion-Suicide Association; It's Time to Lift the Veil on Hidden Health Risks of Terminating Pregnancy
Byline: Clarke Forsythe and Mailee Smith, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES
All 11 active judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit in St. Louis re- cently heard one of the most important abortion cases in the federal courts today. The case, Planned Parenthood v. Rounds, involves a South Dakota statute requiring informed consent before a woman undergoes an abortion. While many in the media have focused on the controversies surrounding President Obama's health care law, this case actually is one of the most significant events on the life issue today.
The hearing focused on what the courts have called the suicide advisory : the statute's requirement that abortion providers give patients a description of all known medical risks of the procedure and statistically significant risk factors .. including . depression [and] increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide.
This case is the latest example of how the lower federal courts repeatedly have tied up reasonable abortion regulations for years, preventing the regulations from taking effect, even when there is direct language from prior Supreme Court decisions supporting the purpose of the law.
The South Dakota law has been bottled up in the courts since it was enacted in 2005 and Planned Parenthood filed suit to block its implementation. In 1992, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the states have "a substantial governmental interest justifying a requirement that a woman be apprised of the health risks of abortion and childbirth. .. It
cannot be questioned that psychological well-being is a facet of health .. In attempting to ensure that a woman apprehend the full consequences of her decision, the State furthers the legitimate purpose of reducing the risk that a woman may elect an
abortion, only to discover later, with devastating psychological consequences, that her decision was not fully informed If the information the State requires to be made available to the woman is truthful and not misleading, the requirement may be permissible."
In 2007, the Supreme Court made it more explicit in its latest abortion case: Whether to have an abortion requires a difficult and painful moral decision. While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort. .. Severe depression and loss of esteem can follow .. The State has an interest in ensuring so grave a choice is well informed
The court also reiterated that state and federal legislatures [have been given] wide discretion to pass legislation in areas where there is medical and scientific uncertainty.
That gap has largely been filled. In the past decade, a growing number of international medical studies have provided important new data.
The South Dakota statute does not mention or require any statement of causation (that abortion causes suicide). Instead, the statute requires a description of the increased risk of suicide after abortion, and that is what the medical studies address.
Americans United for Life filed the lead amicus brief on the documented medical evidence demonstrating the association between abortion and suicide, a brief that was resubmitted at the request of the court in December. The brief was filed on behalf of Christian Medical & Dental Associations, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Catholic Medical Association, Physicians for Life, and National Association of Pro-Life Nurses.
Numerous peer-reviewed medical studies have found an association between abortion and suicide. Many others have found an association between induced abortion and depression, which is a major risk factor for suicide. …