Flann O'Brien A Postmodernist Who Happens to Be a Thomist

By Villar Flor, Carlos | The Review of Contemporary Fiction, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview

Flann O'Brien A Postmodernist Who Happens to Be a Thomist


Villar Flor, Carlos, The Review of Contemporary Fiction


There has been ample critical debate about the propriety of including Flann O'Brien among the portents or forerunners of postmodernist (either with or without a hyphen) writing. Keith Hopper places him among the "Holy Trinity" of Irish writers who, by the start of the Second World War, produced emblematic works marking "the moment when high modernism drifted, almost imperceptibly, into post-modernism: Joyce's Finnegans Wake (1939), Beckett's Murphy (1938), and Flann O'Brien's At Swim-Two-Birds (1939)" (Hopper, "The Dismemberment," 120). Since a comprehensive definition of postmodernist literature is rather inaccessible, whatever claims are made for O'Brien's inclusion must examine his compliance with the various notions associated with this contemporary sensibility. Certainly many of such are easy to find in O'Brien's early oeuvre: irony, playfulness, parody, pastiche, pun, metafiction, intertextuality, poioumenon ... But some other ingredients of postmodernity, perhaps closer to the Derridean deconstructive relativism, may admit some further, possibly vigorous, discussion. A common attitude among postmodernist authors, which distances them from the modernist search for meaning in a fragmented world, is the abandonment of any pretence of undertaking this search, which for them is pointless and often the object of a playful parody. Or in the words of Snipp-Walmsley, "postmodernism attacks the ideas of a stable, autonomous being and the possibility of grounding our knowledge in certainty and truth" (408). Critics such as Thomas Shea imply that O'Brien's subversion of conventional narrative structure and rendering of collapsing discourses entail an ultimate lack of meaning and its resulting "desperately squalid void" (Shea 142). But such an approach may not be easily compatible with the sense of purpose of a Christian outlook and its perspective of the ultimate realities of existence.

Although modern literary theory teaches us that biographical input should not be decisive for criticism, some credit may be given to O'Brien's major biographer, Anthony Cronin, who had contact with the writer over twenty years, when he affirms that the author remained a practising Catholic, and never rejected the Christian faith in which he was brought up. Cronin even goes as far as stating that he "was a medieval Thomist in his attitude to many things including scientific speculation and discovery. For the Thomist all the great questions have been settled and the purpose of existence is clear. There is only one good, the salvation of the individual soul; and only one final catastrophe, damnation" (Cronin 104). Far from attempting to evaluate the degree of personal commitment to his faith, my aim here is to determine if the implied author of O'Brien's early fiction (following Seymour Chatman's 1990 revision of the traditional concept proposed by Booth in 1961, that is, the productivity of the meaning of a given text such as given by the real reader) reveals a sense of purpose and an assumption of the ultimate realities of life conceived from a Christian perspective. My attention will focus on O'Brien's early novels, At Swim-Two-Birds and The Third Policeman, which hold considerable critical unanimity as regards their stature as O'Brien's masterpieces and early examples of an experimental writing arguably akin to postmodernism. Even if we may find in both novels some essential postmodernist traits such as "ambiguity, discontinuity, heterodoxy, pluralism, randomness, revolt, perversion, deformation" (Hassan 94), the implied author's (alleged) understanding of a world ruled by a divine providence must make a substantial difference to the major postmodern tenets.

It is true that not every critic places O'Brien primarily on the postmodern shelf. Joshua D. Esty, for example, considers it more "appropriate to evaluate O'Brien's aesthetic anew in postcolonial rather than postmodern terms" (Esty 41). Neil R. Davison, in turn, feels inclined to deny O'Brien the benefit of the (postmodern) doubt precisely because he sees the author as "a product of parochial Irish Catholicism,' displaying a characteristic "somatophobia" and male repression projected onto the female, "which in turn serves to image, contain, and defeat sexual appetite, psychoanalytic investigation, incestuous desire, fear of female power, and, indeed, subversion of patriarchal authority. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Flann O'Brien A Postmodernist Who Happens to Be a Thomist
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.