Dual Nature in the Creation of Disciplinary Identity: A Socio-Historical Review of Palaeolithic Archaeology in Japan

By Nakazawa, Yuichi | Asian Perspectives: the Journal of Archaeology for Asia and the Pacific, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview

Dual Nature in the Creation of Disciplinary Identity: A Socio-Historical Review of Palaeolithic Archaeology in Japan


Nakazawa, Yuichi, Asian Perspectives: the Journal of Archaeology for Asia and the Pacific


INTRODUCTION

In contemporary archaeology, disciplinary identity is not only established by the scholarly activities within a particular scientific community, but also can be framed through transformations in relationships among various social organizations and individuals that are heavily influenced by the historical trajectory of social circumstances. The present article clarifies how this dual nature plays a role in creating disciplinary identity, by explicating how Palaeolithic archaeology in Japan has developed as a scientific discipline. Through a review of last 50 years of Palaeolithic research, changes in the roles of social organizations and individuals are evaluated in the peculiar context of modern Japanese archaeology.

PALAEOLITHIC RESEARCH IN JAPAN

Research History

Palaeolithic research in Japan has gone on for more than half a century, since the first recognition of a Pleistocene archaeological site--the iwajuku site, about 90 km north of Tokyo--in 1949 by Tadahiro Aizawa, an amateur archaeologist who found lithic artifacts from Pleistocene sediments in a road profile, followed by an excavation conducted by academic archaeologists from Meiji University in Tokyo (Sugihara 1956; see also Aikens and Higuchi 1982; imamura 1996). The history of research into human antiquity in the Pleistocene, however, is much shorter in Japan than in Europe. Indeed, European research on what was termed the "Old Stone Age" began in the early to mid-nineteenth century with the discovery of stone tools in association with extinct animals in the Somme Valley of northwestern France by Boucher de Perthes, followed by the recognition of human antiquity by Edouard Lartet and Gabriel de Mortillet among others (Sackett 1981; Trigger 1989: 90-99). The first discoveries of Palaeolithic sites in Japan were different from those of Europe in several ways.

First of all, unlike the association of artifacts and extinct animals, the first Pleistocene sites in Japan lacked organic remains. The discoveries of human bones have been restricted to several sites, notably the Minatogawa 1 skeleton in Okinawa Island (Baba et al. 1998) and the Hamakita is in Honshu (Kondo and Matsu'ura 2005), although in both cases there is no evidence of associated artifacts. The lack of faunal remains in archaeological sites is also common. This is different from terminal Pleistocene sites recovered in North America, where the Folsom points were first discovered in association with bison bones (Meltzer 1983). In Japan, stone artifacts have largely been recovered without other human activity identifiers from Pleistocene sediments, sediments that are often visually distinct from the overlying dark Holocene humic soils (Watanabe and Sakagami 1999). The lack of faunal remains from Pleistocene sites is still common in more recent work on the Palaeolithic (Akazawa 1999; Nakazawa and Izuho 2006) and this "organically sterile" condition is also generally maintained in later prehistoric sites (i.e., from Jomon and Yayoi periods) except in special types of sites such as shell middens, karstic caves, water-logging, and bog sites (Habu 2004: 214-221). This preservation bias is caused by the humid environment and the high acidity of sediments in Japan (Barnes 2004). Besides the recognition of a stratigraphic position commensurate with a probable Pleistocene date and a lack of pottery, not enough evidence (e.g., radiometric dates, association of extinct animals) was present to securely establish the notion of the Palaeolithic in this early stage of Palaeolithic research.

This situation is clearly reflected in the culture-historical term of "Preceramic" that designates the Pleistocene Palaeolithic period in Japan (e.g., Ohyi 1968, 1978; Sugihara 1965; Tozawa 1990). Because of this preservation bias, research became heavily skewed toward lithics. Comparisons of lithic technology and diagnostic stone tool types (e.g., transverse burins, blade and microblade technologies) showed similarities with already known Palaeolithic cultural traits in Europe and North Asia (e. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dual Nature in the Creation of Disciplinary Identity: A Socio-Historical Review of Palaeolithic Archaeology in Japan
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.