Shut Down the Nincompoop Commission! as the Equality Quango Demands More Rights for Gypsies, Unions, Prisoners and Terrorists , QUENTIN LETTS Says It's Time to Give It the Chop

Daily Mail (London), March 6, 2012 | Go to article overview

Shut Down the Nincompoop Commission! as the Equality Quango Demands More Rights for Gypsies, Unions, Prisoners and Terrorists , QUENTIN LETTS Says It's Time to Give It the Chop


TRY TO imagine a political party with the following manifesto: more rights for gypsies, giving prisoners the vote, being soft on anti-capitalism protesters and making it easier for trade unions to strike.

Readers, I can sense your snouts tingling.I just know you would relish having such a party on the ballot paper -- if only to avoid it. Our imaginary political party -- perhaps we can call it the Party of Loon -- believes terrorism-related offences should carry no higher constraints on the freedom of suspects than other alleged crimes.

Shoplifting and the planting of bombs on the London Underground, in other words, shall be approached equally.

The Loonies (as we will call followers of this Party of Loon) are against prohibiting terrorist organisations because that might infringe their egalitarian rights, poor darlings.

The Loonies argue against the detention of asylum-seekers. They also, rather gratuitously, repeat unsubstantiated slurs about the mistreatment of Iraqi civilians by British soldiers.

Oh, and they happily spend millions of pounds of public money -- your money, taken from your wages -- on propaganda officers specialising in race relations, militant secularism and transgender rights outreach. Quite a manifesto, is it not?

How many votes do you think the Party of Loon would receive? Fewer, I suspect, than the Lib Dems or UKIP. It might even do worse than the British National Party, whose uncongenial grunts are usually held to be beyond the pale of the body politic.

Expensive

A party which stood on the policies I have listed would probably lose its deposit in every constituency throughout the kingdom, save perhaps in trendy Islington.

So why does the current Government, like its Labour predecessor, tolerate just such a platform of Left-wing madness from an expensive state body? And why are we paying at least [pounds sterling]70 million a year for the privilege?

The organisation is the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC,) which yesterday presented those damaging proposals -- and more -- in its loftysounding 'human rights review'.

Confronted by that jumble of letters, EHRC, your eyes perhaps glaze. The same letters, in a slightly different order, stand for the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Confusion is to be sympathised with, for both organisations are remote organs of the anti-democratic Left.

The EHRC is the outfit which is led by suave Trevor Phillips, that Labour-leaning friend of Peter Mandelson.

It was set up only in 2007 and it exists to enforce, promote and clarify the egalitarian agenda and equality laws which were pushed through by Harriet Harman in the New Labour years. In short, it is a thorough menace which we can no longer afford. When will the politicians admit as much?

Despite the fancy title, its 'human rights review' yesterday was, in many ways, a statement of the obvious. The EHRC, whose officers are paid fat wages to campaign for more equality and human rights, thinks that more must be done to achieve 'equality'.

Blow me down with a peashooter.Public sector staff engaged in a spot of job justification? You don't say!

The review was the result of more than two years' 'work' and cost a reported [pounds sterling]150,000. That sum, like so much else produced by the EHRC, appears to be disingenuous because it does not include labour costs.

It certainly did not include the [pounds sterling]252,000 annual pay of the EHRC's 'director of engagement and intelligence', Richard Emmott.

All human beings are equal, but Comrade Emmott -- whose intelligence must be open to question, given the guff he produces -- is more equal than others.

Fanfare

A true analysis of the cost of this chin-stroking 'human rights review', which was launched with as little press fanfare as possible, would include the price of the thousands of bureaucrats made necessary by the attendant rules and regulations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Shut Down the Nincompoop Commission! as the Equality Quango Demands More Rights for Gypsies, Unions, Prisoners and Terrorists , QUENTIN LETTS Says It's Time to Give It the Chop
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.