What If Taft Came Back?
Byline: Wes Vernon, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Let your imagination run wild: What if President William Howard Taft suddenly disappeared nearly 100 years ago on his way out the White House door and was resurrected (as certified by scientists) in 2012?
That fantasy would leave intact his previous life's accomplishments as an educator, solicitor general, holder of two judgeships, governor-general of the Philippines and, of course, president for four years.
In Taft 2012, Taft's nine years (1921-1930) as chief justice of the United States are necessarily omitted because they occurred during the 100 years of his mysterious absence.
No small matter, given that a seat on the high court was his ultimate ambition. (Yes, even more than the presidency, which he had little interest in seeking. The Republican Party and his ambitious wife, Nellie, persuaded Taft to go for the White House.)
Even minus the Supreme Court years, the rest of Taft's distinguished career is ample grist for a fictitious mill of speculation as to how our 27th president would view 21st-century America.
However, speculative fiction such as this would do well at least to present its main character in a way that comports with the historical record. Otherwise, what's the point? Why not just write fiction?
Yes, a returned William Howard Taft likely would be heartened that black people occupy prominent positions in the U.S. mainstream, including that a black American could ascend to his old job at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, however horrifying he would find the substance of President Obama's worldview.
However, if William Howard Taft were back with us in 2012, is it not logical that his interest in the 2012 presidential race would transcend the relatively incidental focus Taft 2012 accords it? Would he not trade barbs with the candidates?
What about same-sex marriage? Abortion? A mandate that every citizen purchase health insurance? Would not Taft, whose brilliant legal mind made him a stickler for the law and the Constitution, have something to say about these suddenly discovered constitutional rights ? …