Regional Differences in Sentencing Practices

By Ahn-Redding, Heather; Ehatt, Colleen et al. | International Journal of Punishment and Sentencing, October 2011 | Go to article overview

Regional Differences in Sentencing Practices


Ahn-Redding, Heather, Ehatt, Colleen, Lamb, Ron, Caster, Bonnier, International Journal of Punishment and Sentencing


Abstract: This study examines various sentencing practices across fifty states in order to determine whether regional differences exist across the United States. Empirical examinations of regional differences in punishment have largely been limited to capital punishment. This current study draws upon Borg's "southern subculture of punitiveness" concept to determine the extent to which regional differences exist in other types of controversial responses to crime, such as life without parole, sex offender registration rates, juvenile waivers, and the civil commitment of sex offenders. The authors expected to find that the southern region uses punitive sentencing practices significantly more than other regions. However, results from permutation testing and pairwise regional comparisons suggest that regions in the U.S. appear more similar than dissimilar in their use of various sanctions. The authors maintain that sentencing uniformity is necessary to maintain the integrity of a criminal justice system that is based on principles of proportionality, equity, and predictability.

Introduction

Attempts to describe American sentencing practices are confounded by the fact that within the nation, there exist distinct jurisdictions for each state, the federal government, the District of Columbia, and the military. Each follows its own set of sentencing practices and laws, thereby creating, in some cases, extreme sentencing variability throughout the country. One of the most polarizing sentencing practices, for example, is that of capital punishment. Thirty-four states, in addition to the federal government and the United States military, practiced capital punishment as of July 2011 (Death Penalty Information Center [DPIC] 2011 b). But even amongst the states that execute offenders, there is widespread variation in its application. As of January 1, 2010, California had 697 inmates on death row, whereas only one person sat on New Hampshire's death row (DPIC 2011b, 2). While twenty-two death penalty states carried out no executions in 2010, Texas put to death seventeen offenders that very same year (3). In addition to variations in sentencing practices, "sentencing guidelines differ in their goals, scope of coverage, design, and operation" [original italics] (Frase 2005, 1190). As a result of the considerable disparities in the types of punishments enacted throughout different jurisdictions, one might categorize certain states as more punitive than others. Yet, there are ways in which a state's level of punitive sentencing might be gauged aside from solely comparing their imprisonment rates and their use of capital punishment.

This study examines various sentencing practices across fifty states in order to determine if geographical differences exist regarding what some might claim are punitive sentencing practices. Empirical examinations of regional differences in punishment have largely focused on the exploration of capital punishment. For example, Hurlbert (1989) found that support for the death penalty was positively correlated with the values and opinions of native southerners in comparison with non-southerners. According to Paternoster, Brame and Bacon (2008), the number of southern executions from 1930 to 1967 exceeded the total number of executions throughout the rest of the United States (30). After the reinstatement of capital punishment in the 1970s, the South still accounted for more executions than any other region from 1977 to 2005 (50). In 2010, the South accounted for 76 percent of the nation's executions, whereas the Midwest and West, respectively, were responsible for 17 and 7 percent (Death Penalty Information Center [DPIC] 201 lb). No executions took place in the northeastern states during 2010. Even in 2000, 89 percent of the nation's executions took place in southern states (DPIC 2011b).

This current study draws upon Borg's (1997) "southern subculture of punitiveness" concept to determine the extent to which regional differences exist in sentencing practices. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Regional Differences in Sentencing Practices
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.