Spiritual Experiences Reconsider: A Relational Approach to the Integration of Psychology and Theology

By Miner, Maureen; Dowson, Martin | Journal of Psychology and Theology, Spring 2012 | Go to article overview

Spiritual Experiences Reconsider: A Relational Approach to the Integration of Psychology and Theology


Miner, Maureen, Dowson, Martin, Journal of Psychology and Theology


Attempts to develop a conceptual integration of psychology and theology typically encounter difficulties at the level of ontological and epistemological presuppositions. Our proposal to overcome some Of these difficulties is to begin an attempt at integration with spiritual experiences--particularly experiences of being in an attachment relationship with God. Accounts of experiences of relationship with God are analyzed using the method of relational and contextual reasoning, a form of complementarity. The resulting synthesis is assessed for its coherence, comprehensiveness, and fruitfulness, as well as its limitations. We offer our relational approach as a method and as a case example of integration.

Debate concerning the relationship between psychology and Christian theology has yielded many proposals for partial or complete integration of these two disciplines. We argue that there are difficulties coordinating psychology and theology at the level of global explanatory systems because of their incommensurate assumptions and breadth of scope. Our solution is to take an instance of lived integration and propose a non-reductionist explanation. The explanation, then, is a particular type of conceptual integration. It is not a grand theory but an explanation of a phenomenon (spiritual experience) that is highly significant both to psychology (experience) and theology (the spiritual quality of the experience). We are reconsidering spiritual experience as a proper starting point for a relational, integrative inquiry. It is a relational inquiry because the particular experience under consideration (perceived relationship with God) is a psycho-spiritual experience that requires a relational explanation. Relationship with God also requires integrative inquiry using psychology and theology, as explained below.

Problematic Issues in Current Integration and Attempted Solutions

Integrative work at the level of total disciplines has focused on overcoming ontological differences, recognizing that psychology asserts a materialistic form of monism (e.g., physical matter is the only reality) whereas theology asserts dualism (e.g., reality is both material and spiritual). Differences arise amongst integrationists over whether to propose a modified monism (e.g., a non-reductive physicalism) or argue for dualism. Another disputed presupposition concerns epistemology, or ways of knowing. "Scientific" ways of knowing via sensory experiences are assumed in psychology (although some approaches within psychology--e.g., psychoanalytic approaches--use a hermeneutic, or interpretive, method); whereas knowledge in theology is based upon interpreted accounts of revelation and nature.

Attempts to overcome ontological and epistemological issues have used either psychology or theology to generate shared assumptions for both disciplines. Often the resulting conceptual integration is partial with only some concepts and approaches from each discipline being compared. Furthermore, there is the danger of equating concepts between disciplines where similar language may hide significant conceptual differences (e.g., Clouse [1997] on sin and unconscious urges; and conversion and insight). Poor conceptual integration tends to privilege one discipline over the other (e.g., Johnson's [199] paper entitled, "Christ, the Lord of psychology"), subordinating one to the other discipline and merging what is incommensurate on the basis of surface similarities.

An alternative proposal has been to use another discipline, such as philosophy, to generate a shared basis upon which, and from which, integration may proceed. Philosophy provides tools for evaluating the internal consistency of differing perspectives and of any resulting synthesis of perspectives. However, philosophy cannot test the validity of the content (as opposed to the structure) of arguments for integration, particularly in cases where such content includes references to the transcendent. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Spiritual Experiences Reconsider: A Relational Approach to the Integration of Psychology and Theology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.