Repeatedly Answering Questions That Elicit Inquiry-Based Thinking Improves Writing

By Radhakrishnan, Phanikiran; Schimmack, Ulrich et al. | Journal of Instructional Psychology, September-December 2011 | Go to article overview

Repeatedly Answering Questions That Elicit Inquiry-Based Thinking Improves Writing


Radhakrishnan, Phanikiran, Schimmack, Ulrich, Lam, Dianne, Journal of Instructional Psychology


Participants engaged in inquiry by practicing how to answer questions about a journal article. Inquiry improves writing by helping one learn more about the topic at hand. Practice improves performance only if learners know how to perform a task accurately (Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Romer, 1993) and answering questions trains them on the best way to engage in inquiry. We implemented an inquiry-based writing intervention to show that students who repeatedly answered questions wrote better after the intervention than before and when compared to those who did not participate in the intervention.

"Writing today is not a frill for the few, but an essential skill for the many" (The National Commission on Writing, 2003). How should teachers help students significantly develop this skill? Our paper identifies key features that writing activities should have with a field study that was part of an initiative sponsored by a psychology department to improve student writing.

Teaching students how to learn improves how they write (see Graham & Perin, 2007; Hillocks, 1986 for meta-analyses). Learning, or inquiring, about phenomena involves describing, defining, hypothesizing (i.e., argumentation) and deriving generalizations (i.e., analysis; Hillocks, 1982). Such strategies enable understanding phenomena leading to writing improvements (Hillocks, 1986). We designed inquiry-based writing activities and tested whether they improved writing (Hypothesis 1).

We also examined if the way students engaged in inquiry-based writing activities could have an impact. Students answered questions that help them engage in each inquiry-based strategy or followed instructions. For example, a question used to engage argumentation was "What results support Hypothesis X?" whereas an instruction was "Present at least one piece of evidence for Hypothesis X". Further, because these ways (or designs) vary in how much they clarify the demands of each inquiry-based strategy, they should vary in their impact on writing quality. Questions should be more effective than instructions because questions focus students' attention on the relevant features of each strategy, increasing students' understanding of what is required from them in each strategy (Hypothesis 2). Research shows that multiple-choice items framed as questions were less difficult than those framed as non-questions, which were harder to understand (Dudycha & Carpenter, 1973), more confusing and ambiguous (Violato & Marini, 1989). Similarly, Lawson, Bodle, Houlette, and Haubner (2006) show that students learn best when they write answers to questions while viewing educational videos because questions mandate students to think deeply about them.

We also hypothesized that practice should improve writing (Hypothesis 3). Practice improves writing (Johnstone, Ashbaugh, & Warfield, 2002) because it helpsacquire skills needed to do the task and procedures required to execute them (Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Romer, 1993). Thus, we combined the practice conditions with the different designs of writing activities. Students who answered questions while engaging in each type of inquiry got repeated opportunities to practice whereas those who received instructions got only one opportunity to practice each type of inquiry and those in the control group did not receive any.

We also explored the efficacy of providing students with both instructions and questions. This group, compared to the group that received only questions enabled us to test, in part, the separate effects of instructions and questions. We predicted that repeated opportunities for practice will only improve writing if we provided students with an effective strategy on how to do the writing task well. Giving students questions or providing them with both questions and instructions would teach them the best method to do the task, leading to similar improvements in writing when compared to the group that only received instructions (Hypothesis 4). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Repeatedly Answering Questions That Elicit Inquiry-Based Thinking Improves Writing
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.