Recovering Judicial Integrity: Toward a Duty-Focused Disqualification Jurisprudence Based on Jewish Law

By Pill, Shlomo | Fordham Urban Law Journal, December 2011 | Go to article overview

Recovering Judicial Integrity: Toward a Duty-Focused Disqualification Jurisprudence Based on Jewish Law


Pill, Shlomo, Fordham Urban Law Journal


Introduction
   I. Judicial Disqualification in American and Traditional Jewish
      Law
      A. The American Approach to Judicial Disqualification
         1. The Underlying Goals of American Recusal
            Jurisprudence
         2. Grounds for Disqualification in American Law
            a. Bias and the Appearance of Bias
            b. Financial Interest
            c. Familial Relationships
            d. Bribes and Gifts
            e. Prior Knowledge
            f. The Due Process Clause
      B. The Traditional Jewish Law of Judicial
         Disqualification and Recusal
         1. Litigation, Courts, and Judges in the Halachic
            System: The Jurisprudential Aims of Jewish
            Disqualification Law
         2. Grounds for Disqualification and Recusal in Jewish
            Law
            a. Disqualification to Maintain the Institutional
               Integrity of the Court
               i. Financial Interest
               ii. Familial Relationships
               iii. Bribes, Gifts, and Personal Favors
               iv. Advisory Opinions
            b. Voluntary Recusal to Preserve the Professional
               Integrity of the Judge
               i. Bias and the Appearance of Bias
               ii. Prior Knowledge
            c. Judges' Extralegal Duty to Treat Litigants
               Equally
 II. The American and Halachic Doctrines of Judicial Removal:
     A Comparison
III. Moving in a New Direction: Toward a Duty-Focused
     Recusal Jurisprudence
     A. Problems with the Current American Doctrine
        1. The Failure of Ad Hoc and Conclusory Recusal
           Doctrines to Adequately Protect Litigants from
           Biased Judgments
        2. The Failure of Expansive Disqualification
           Doctrines to Promote Public Confidence in the
           Justice System
        3. The Failure of Modern Recusal Law to Engender
           an Integrious Judiciary
     B. Duty-Focused Disqualification: Some Proposals
        1. Thinking About the Roles of Courts and Judges in
           the American System of Adjudication
        2. Curtail the Role of Mandatory Disqualification in
           Eliminating Judicial Bias
        3. Expand Judges' Professional Obligation to
           Voluntarily Recuse
        4. Ensure Sound Legal Judgments and Promote
           Integrious Judging
Conclusion

One who grabs too much has not grabbed anything, but one that grabs just a little has surely grabbed that much.

--Babylonian Talmud, Yoma 80a

INTRODUCTION

The United States Supreme Court's ruling that West Virginia Supreme Court Justice Brent Benjamin's decision not to recuse himself from a case involving a major donor to his judicial election campaign violated Due Process (1) sparked a storm of interest in the (in)adequacy of the judicial disqualification system. (2) Contemporary recusal law makes conclusory determinations of actual or apparent judicial bias, resulting in an inconsistent doctrine that allows dishonest judges to resist recusal and supplant litigants' legal rights in favor of their own personal agendas. (3) The current approach also erodes public confidence in the justice system by under and over-enforcing bias-based recusal, (4) and its focus on top-down mandatory disqualification fails to adequately encourage judges to be personally and professionally integrious. (5)

This Note suggests that these problems might be mitigated by comprehensively rethinking our approach to judicial disqualification based on halacha, traditional Jewish law. (6) Halachic recusal law offers an alternative to the current American approach, a jurisprudence that is grounded in courts' and judges' personal and professional duties, and which empowers jurists to develop their own integrity by limiting mandatory disqualification and relying instead on judges' duty-consciousness and self-disciplining decisions to voluntarily recuse. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Recovering Judicial Integrity: Toward a Duty-Focused Disqualification Jurisprudence Based on Jewish Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.