Post-Communist Legacies and Political Behavior and Attitudes

By Pop-Eleches, Grigore; Tucker, Joshua A. | Demokratizatsiya, Spring 2012 | Go to article overview

Post-Communist Legacies and Political Behavior and Attitudes


Pop-Eleches, Grigore, Tucker, Joshua A., Demokratizatsiya


Explaining Post-Communist Differences

In the world outside of the post-communist countries of Central and .Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, younger, more educated, and more democratically inclined citizens tend to have a left-wing bias in terms of their self-placement on a standard left-right scale. In post-communist countries, however, it is the opposite: younger, more educated, and more democratically inclined citizens all tend to have a right-wing bias. (1) Why might this be the case? One could point to the fact that older citizens in these countries had largely been socialized under communist--and hence leftwing--regimes. Or one could point to the fact that communism-- a non-democratic regime--had a leftist orientation, and thus democratic opposition and a propensity to self-identify on the right hand side of the political spectrum could seem like natural bedfellows. Alternatively, it is conceivable that those who are less educated might still expect the state to provide for all their basic social welfare needs, precisely as the communist state had done previously, while at the same time criticizing the new democratic state for failing to provide these benefits. We have actually tested these different explanations against each other, and find stronger support for the second and third hypotheses than for the early socialization explanation, but for now, the key point is that it is difficult to imagine an answer to that question that did not somehow invoke the specter of the communist past shared by these countries.

In order to answer the above question, and a range of other similar questions about the underlying causes of post-communist political attitudes and behavior, we really have to tackle three main analytical tasks. First, we have to establish the key features that distinguished the communist experience from the social, political, and economic experiences of other countries in the world. Second, we need to formulate a set of theoretical arguments that link these distinctive features of communist regimes and societies to the political attitudes and behavior of the citizens who now live in these "post-communist" societies. Finally, we need a rigorous, falsifiable method for ascertaining whether or not our assertions about the effects of the communist past on political attitudes and behavior in post-communist countries are supported by empirical evidence.

We are currently at work on a book manuscript, tentatively titled Communism's Shadow: Historical Legacies, and Political Values and Behavior that addresses all three of these tasks, and then tests these competing theoretical explanations on a wide range of political attitudes and behaviors. (2) In the remainder of this article, however, we briefly present our general thoughts in terms of the second of these tasks: introducing a set of rigorous theoretical arguments about the manner in which the communist era past could affect political attitudes and behavior in the post-communist present. While this is not an empirical article, the eventual empirical analysis we have conducted (3) and plan to conduct in the future strongly motivates our overriding argument: if we want to claim that the past matters, then we need to have a priori theories about how the past matters, and these theories need to have observable implications that can be tested empirically.

We identify four potential pathways by which communist-era legacies could affect political attitudes and behavior in the post-communist present. First, it is possible that living through communism, and in particular being "politically socialized" under communism results in different attitudes about politics and/or different forms of political behavior. Conversely, it is possible that people who lived through communism do not approach politics any differently than those who did not, but that communism left behind a different socio-demographic landscape, which in the aggregate leads to different patterns of political attitudes and behavior. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Post-Communist Legacies and Political Behavior and Attitudes
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.