A Time for Change? Dr Behrooz Behbudi, Founder of the Council for a Democratic Iran, Talked to Pat Lancaster about His Recently Published Book and His Aspirations for the Land of His Birth

By Lancaster, Pat | The Middle East, July 2012 | Go to article overview

A Time for Change? Dr Behrooz Behbudi, Founder of the Council for a Democratic Iran, Talked to Pat Lancaster about His Recently Published Book and His Aspirations for the Land of His Birth


Lancaster, Pat, The Middle East


In your book you paint an idyllic picture of your childhood in Iran, where your father was a trusted member of the Court of the Shah, what is your current status with regard to the Islamic Republic?

During the presidency of Mr Khatami, I travelled to Iran on a charity mission following the Khorasan earthquake, after being away from my country for many years. After that trip I wanted to create more links between the Iranian and American people. I did extensive work but eventually realised that Iran needs fundamental, not cosmetic, change and with the current regime it is impossible to achieve any substantial and lasting links between the people. Therefore, I decided to change my approach from a humanitarian and cultural one to a political one.

Since becoming involved in politics opposing the ruling regime in Iran, the regime looks upon me as an exiled political dissident.

Where, in your opinion, did things begin to go wrong for Iran, beth domestically and within the international community?

We must go back to the time of the rule of Reza Shah and then follow it to the time of Mohammad Reza Shah. The clerics did not appear on the stage overnight. They thought long and hard about their plans to gain power in Iran. The problems of contemporary Iran began the moment the clerical establishment looked upon itself as the new rulers of the nation. The clerics came to power on the basis of the nation's sincere religious beliefs, although without any real understanding of politics, economics, sociology, international law, diplomatic relations or any other aspect of running complicated affairs of state. The consequences of their ignorance are right in front of our eyes.

What makes matters worse is the way world powers have been lenient towards a regime whose reactionary and destructive nature is very well known to them, putting their own financial interests before the interests of the Iranian people whose basic human rights have been trampled upon by one of the most tyrannical regimes in the history of mankind.

Do you believe the majority of Iranians are in accord with the current ruling regime?

To answer this question one needs to have access to information gathered through independent surveys and polls taken in a free society. None of these are currently possible in today's Iran because the regime controls every aspect of the nation's public life through repressive measures.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

However, there are plenty of indicators that prove the majority of the Iranian people oppose the present regime and its policies. Such objections can be measured, for example, by the protest march of as many as three million people through the streets of Tehran, who gathered without any prior organisation or call from opposition leaders.

Compare this number with the regime's paltry rent-a-crowd supporters, bussed in to take part in pro-government rallies, and one can only conclude that the opponents of the regime far outnumber its supporters. This popular opposition does not surface frequently because of harsh and bloody crackdowns on any shows of opposition, perpetrated by the regime's organised, repressive gangs.

Add this ever-present threat to the harsh economic conditions--poverty and deprivation--the regime's interference in the private lives of its citizens, the lack of freedom of speech and public assembly, censorship of the media, the problems of women, youth and the discrimination faced by religious and ethnic minorities, then the obvious conclusion must be that this regime does not have any mandate from the Iranian people.

The threat of Iran developing a nuclear weapons programme has dominated global news and caused international consternation, How can this issue be best addressed diplomatically?

Iran will not make a U-turn on the nuclear issue. It cannot do so because it has spent a great deal of political capital on this venture. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Time for Change? Dr Behrooz Behbudi, Founder of the Council for a Democratic Iran, Talked to Pat Lancaster about His Recently Published Book and His Aspirations for the Land of His Birth
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.