DIRTY FIGHT FOR POLITICAL GOLD; Westminster Is Locked in a Brutal Game of Power Politics with Nick Clegg and David Cameron in the Fight of Their Lives, Writes DAVID WILLIAMSON. the Coalition Battle over Lords Reform and Constituency Boundaries Is Really a Struggle for Survival

Wales On Sunday (Cardiff, Wales), August 12, 2012 | Go to article overview

DIRTY FIGHT FOR POLITICAL GOLD; Westminster Is Locked in a Brutal Game of Power Politics with Nick Clegg and David Cameron in the Fight of Their Lives, Writes DAVID WILLIAMSON. the Coalition Battle over Lords Reform and Constituency Boundaries Is Really a Struggle for Survival


Byline: DAVID WILLIAMSON

Q: Tory rebels killed off the Liberal Democrat dream of Lords reform so Nick Clegg has torpedoed David Cameron's cherished plan to equalise the size of constituencies and cut the number of MPs by 50. This is simple tit-for-tat politics, isn't it? A: The "tat" that Nick Clegg wants to destroy is a mortal threat to the future of the Lib Dems. The constituency changes could all but wipe-out his party. According to respected commentator Martin Kettle: "With Liberal Democrat support tanking at 10% in the polls (compared with 23% in 2010), the prospect of fewer than 10 Lib Dem MPs holding on in 2015 would be a real one."

Q: Could it be that apocalyptic for the party of such gleaming household names such as Vince Cable and Paddy Ashdown? A: Even if the parties gained exactly the same share of results as in the 2010 election (when the Lib Dems were riding quite high from Mr Clegg's performance in the television debates) it would still be a very bad night.

According to UK Polling Report, all parties would lose seats if the number of MPs was slashed from 650 to 600 but the Lib Dems would suffer the biggest proportional loss.

The changes would cut the number of Conservative MPs by just seven, but push down Labour's tally by 28 and the Lib Dems' by 11 - a major blow for a party which has just 57 people in the Commons.

Q: Why does this matter so much to the Conservatives? A: The fact the party of Disraeli, Churchill and Thatcher failed to win a majority against Gordon Brown's Labour still hurts like a sting from a hornet. If the reorganisation had taken place the Tories would still lack an absolute majority but would have 299 of the 600 seats.

The party argues that the present system is weighted in favour in Labour and insists it is wrong that constituencies vary so drastically in size.

Is it fair that the average Welsh constituency has 57,040 voters while for a seat in the southeast of England the figure is 75,041? Does the argument that Wales needs a higher proportion of MPs to ensure its voice is heard in the Commons hold water in the age of devolution? David Cameron last week came to Wales and insisted he will fight to force the changes through, saying: "The country would like to see a smaller House of Commons costing less money with equal sized constituencies, and I'll be challenging them in the Commons to vote for that."

He can also point out that the 2010 Lib Dem manifesto stated that the party wanted to introduce proportional representation and then would "be able to reduce the number of MPs by 150" - creating a parliament of just 500.

Q: So this policy allows the Conservatives to be the champions of a fairer democracy while fighting for a system that would make it easier to win a majority? A: Labour has denounced the changes as gerrymandering and left-leaning commentator Mr Kettle snorts: "There is absolutely nothing fair about new boundaries which would give 50% of the seats in parliament to a party securing just 36% of the vote, as would have been the case on these boundaries in 2010."

Q: How would Wales be affected by the changes? A: Wales would see its number of MPs slashed from 40 to 30. Historic constituencies such as Montgomeryshire would, under present plans, vanish.

UK Polling Report estimates this would leave Labour on 20 seats (-6) and the Conservatives on six (-2) with the Lib Dems and Plaid Cymru each going down from three to two.

In contrast, the southwest of England would lose just two MPs and the southeast of England would say goodbye to a solitary one.

Q: Would Assembly elections be affected by the redrawing of the Westminster map? A: Not necessarily, but at present 40 of the Assembly's 60 AMs are elected from the same constituencies used in Westminster elections, with 20 coming from regional lists.

The Wales Office has published a green paper which suggests that half of AMs could be elected from the 30 proposed new constituencies, with half coming from the regional list. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

DIRTY FIGHT FOR POLITICAL GOLD; Westminster Is Locked in a Brutal Game of Power Politics with Nick Clegg and David Cameron in the Fight of Their Lives, Writes DAVID WILLIAMSON. the Coalition Battle over Lords Reform and Constituency Boundaries Is Really a Struggle for Survival
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.