Democracy and Rights: A Canadian Perspective

By McLachlin, Beverley | Canadian Speeches, January-February 2001 | Go to article overview

Democracy and Rights: A Canadian Perspective


McLachlin, Beverley, Canadian Speeches


"TEXT 1756.","Canadian Speeches: Volume 14, #06, January/February 2001.","Chief Justice Of Canada.","Democracy and rights: a Canadian perspective.","BEVERLEY McLACHLIN.","Democracry. Rights. Constitution. Judiciary.","Individual and group rights are the cement that holds together the diverse cultures, religions, languages, races and ethnic groups that constitute Canada. But group rights paradoxically both promote and conflict with individual rights. Canada's ability to reconcile individual and group rights is seen as key to it history of peace, prosperity, and the fulfillment of its citizens. Given tolerance and mutual respect, Canada's history suggests that recognition of group rights may offer progress to the problem of ethnic divisions that besets many countries. Address at a Conference of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, Jerusalem, Israel, December 19, 2000."," A visitor from a distant planet dropping in on my county, Canada, might be forgiven for feeling confused. Her first impression would be of a prosperous, peaceful country. People of all races, colours and cultures live together in relative harmony. As everywhere on earth, violence occurs, but its levels are low. Women, gays and members of minority groups occupy prominent positions in business and government. Health services are good and the standard of living is high. And if to confirm her initial impressions, she consulted the United Nations Human Development Index, she would find her initial impressions confirmed: Canada is the best country in the world in which to live. Of course, the UN Index doesn't take Canadian winters into account, but that's a minor quibble of no account to we northerners who revel, or so we pretend, in ice and snow.

But on a closer examination, our inter-galactical observer might begin to wonder if Canada is as peaceful and prosperous as it at first seemed. She would read in the papers that a substantial number, albeit a minority, of people in the Province of Quebec profess that they would like to establish their own country. On the television news at night she might see the spectacle of Aboriginal fishers who want to take lobster out of season off the coast of New Brunswick shouting at federal fisheries officers who want to stop them. She might hear women complaining that they still are not equally represented in government, the courts and big business, and gays complaining that they can't be legally married. And if she wandered into the local shopping mall she might hear people grumbling about another boatload of Asians who just landed off British Columbia's shores. And if our visitor happened to land in the middle of an election campaign like the one that just concluded, she would also hear people arguing about organized crime, child poverty, western alienation and whether we should have a law against abortion. She might well be forgiven for asking: is Canada really a stable, peaceful prosperous country? Or is it a "basket case" about to fall apart?

The answer is that Canada is a complex multicultural country made up of many different groups and individuals pushing their own agendas and protesting loudly about what they see as injustices. But the answer is also that we really are simultaneously a stable, peaceful, prosperous country. We are a stable, peaceful prosperous country because we have learned to accept and accommodate our conflicts and differences. How have we done this? Through the political process to be sure. But even more, through the process of rights. Fundamental rights, both individual and group, are the language through which, more than any other, we work out the myriad accommodations and compromises that make our life together possible.

Today, I would like to share with you a few thoughts on the Canadian experience with nationalism, democracy and peaceful coexistence, and how our acceptance of individual and group rights -- "rights talk" (1) -- helps to make it work.

First, I pause for definitions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Democracy and Rights: A Canadian Perspective
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.