Accommodate Quebec or Canada Is Gone

By Morton, Desmond | Canadian Speeches, January-February 1996 | Go to article overview

Accommodate Quebec or Canada Is Gone


Morton, Desmond, Canadian Speeches


Last year, almost to the day, I spoke to the Association on my perceptions of the future. I am back to explain why I was wrong and to show that, by constant practice, I may actually do the job well. Come to think of it, by reading over what I said to you on December 7, 1994, I am not sure that I grossly misled you. I suggested that 1995 would be a year of decision, that persuading Quebec to remain in Confederation would be a tough job made much tougher by what had happened in the previous 15 years.

I spoke of my pride in the valiant souls who would be making the struggle for Canada. And I suggested that the rest of Canada would reassure what friends our country still has in Quebec by lecturing less and listening more. I said then that we had to keep this country together and I believe it still, with all the greater passion of someone who has shared in the heat of the struggle, if not the bleeding.

In the intervening months, we at the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada have been preoccupied with Quebec-Canada relations. It was not for want of interest in other subjects -- Canada's access to the electronic highway, the future of peace-keeping, how to break cultural barriers with China. But always we have been dragged back to the national preoccupation of both our nations.

In the intervening months, the rest of Canada has felt rather complacent. Polls told us all, until mid-October, that Quebec would vote No. And for good reasons., most of them economic. The breakup of Canada would be devastating to all of us, Quebecois and others, at least in the short run. And the beneficiaries of any run away industries would not be Mike Harris or even Frank McKenna but our American neighbors. Business knew that this was a classic lose-lose scenario, at least in the short-run and, in the long run we are all dead.

However the campaign was a lot harder to win than most people realized. I warned last year that the federalist message seemed terribly negative. There was little appeal then or later to another bond of Quebec-Canada unity, a proud identity with a country Quebecers helped build as much as anyone. Nor was there much sense of what Quebecers', rightly or wrongly, had come to feel about the events of the years since their last referendum. If federalists still had a safe margin, why were the polls showing sovereignists inching ever upwards? Why did polls show federalist leaders, on the whole, far behind sovereignist leaders like Lucien Bouchard? And, above all, why did a majority of Quebecers show such distaste for the constitutional status quo?

These were not mysteries in the federalist strategic planning. But what flexibility did they have? Could they tell Jean Chretien to depart? Most of them have been his supporters for years. Could they ask the rest of Canada to rethink positions taken with such ringing certainty in 1990 and 1992? In doing so, would they have not called down the dual fire of Reformers and Pequistes, wakening Quebecers to bad memories and fresh anger? Yes, the Bouchard danger was always there. So was the danger posed by the alliance of the three sovereignist leaders, Parizeau, Dumont and Bouchard. But perhaps Parizeau would insist on carrying the campaign himself. One could pray. One could pray that, as in 1980, the gaffes would be on the sovereignist side. One's knees ached.

And ached. The gaffes came from enthusiastic federalists. Claude Garcia's demand that separatism be crushed was shrewdly translated into a call that Quebec's hope and pride be crushed. Yes, Parizeau stumbled too, but then came Bouchard, rescuing certain failure, adding a full 5% with his Teflon-coated charisma. Here was a man Quebecers believed, much as Westerners find Preston Manning convincing. Both men have used the fiction that they are removed from politics and ambition. Both, in their utterly distinct ways, speak to distinct societies. Neither they nor their supporters have the remotest understanding of the other though they have much in common. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Accommodate Quebec or Canada Is Gone
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.