Religious Charities and Government Funding

By Reda, Ayman | International Advances in Economic Research, August 2012 | Go to article overview

Religious Charities and Government Funding


Reda, Ayman, International Advances in Economic Research


Abstract The government has the responsibility of providing a social service to its citizens. It decides whether to award funds to a religious nonprofit, secular nonprofit, or to produce the service itself. Religious charities are willing to provide the service at lower costs if they can use the funds as an opportunity to proselytize their doctrine. This proselytizing alters the religious preferences of believers in society. In a situation of equal grants to religious charities, this has the consequence of reducing the number of extremists. Furthermore, conservative religious denominations may discriminate against non-religious individuals in the provision of the social service.

Keywords Charities * Nonprofits * Religion * Government * Faith-based

JEL L3 * Z12 * H5

Introduction

On 29 January 2001, the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives was established with the objective of creating a partnership with faith-based agencies in order to achieve common goals in the field of social service provision. This development raised strong arguments with regards to its legality under the laws of the Constitution. It also initiated an extensive debate from all interested parties on the effectiveness of faith-based social service providers in relation to other providers, and whether or not they possess special advantages that warrant any special treatment from the government. This debate will continue and even intensify as the program progresses. Religious denominations and agencies will be in constant competition to acquire government funding in order to achieve their specific interests. Political parties now have a useful tool that they can refer to during elections when in need of religious endorsements. It seems that without careful examination, such an initiative may not necessarily lead to the desired productive partnership that many would hope for or expect.

The purpose of this paper is to examine important aspects of the relationship between religious nonprofits and the government. The paper presents an economic model that describes this relationship in order to give us an insight into the different motives of these institutions and the social and religious outcomes that arise as a result of their interaction. We study this relationship by investigating the impact of government funding on religious charities and on religion in the society as a whole. The model derives results that have important policy implications for present and future programs by the government to fund religious and secular charities. It raises many significant issues that are sometimes overlooked by many parties involved in the debate.

Literature Review

An essential component of the nonprofit sector consists of religious charities and faith-based agencies. The vast majority of the theoretical literature on the economics of nonprofits has focused on the choices of private donors, the economic functions and decisions of nonprofit agencies, and the impact of income and wealth redistribution policies by the public sector on the decisions of donors and nonprofits. (1) There has been minimal examination of the impact of government policies on the religious state of society, both at the individual and group level. In addition, the models have treated all types of nonprofits identically, while none have sought to examine religious nonprofits in particular.

The majority of empirical work on religious nonprofits has been in the fields of sociology of religion and religious studies research. These empirical studies have aimed to study the unique nature of religious charities and also to present comparative analysis with secular or for-profit organizations. In their study of faith-based agencies in Texas, where the concept of the Faith-Based Initiative was first implemented, Ebaugh et al. (2003) argue that faith-based agencies do not differ from secular agencies in the types of services they provide to their recipients. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Religious Charities and Government Funding
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.