Decision Procedure for Achieving an Informed Consent

By Switankowsky, Irene; Di Carlo, Chris | Humane Health Care International, Fall 1997 | Go to article overview

Decision Procedure for Achieving an Informed Consent


Switankowsky, Irene, Di Carlo, Chris, Humane Health Care International


Correspondence and reprint requests: Irene Switankowsky, Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.

A physician obtaining patient consent is considerably different from a patient providing an informed consent. (1) If the patient agrees to but does not comprehend the medical treatment, consent is merely obtained. To provide consent, on the other hand, is to ensure that the patient understands the medical procedure and therefore gives a truly informed consent. If the patient does not give an informed consent, the treatment administered is potentially illegal because it could be considered an assault under criminal law. On a philosophical level, uninformed consent undermines a patient's moral right to self-determination. With informed consent, the patient gives the physician express permission to proceed with a particular medical treatment. This decision should be consistent with the values to which the patient adheres and which establishes them as an autonomous person. Thus, the issue of informed consent is not merely a legal one of signing a consent form, but is also a moral one of informing a patient of all the relevant medical treatments.

In this paper, we assume that patients do indeed have rights, and accordingly we will clarify what rights are involved in the obtaining and providing of informed consent, and consider what conditions must be satisfied to achieve an informed consent. We also articulate a decision procedure which, when adhered to by the physician and patient, will increase the probability of attaining informed consent.

The Rights of the Patient

Positive and Negative Rights

As medical practice emerges from the days of physician paternalism and enters into a new phase of patient "consumerism," (2) the rights of the patient are the central focus in the issue of informed consent. Of the various definitions of rights, two types will concern us here--negative and positive rights. A negative right guides our behaviour by telling us what not to do, such as not interferring with others. The Ten Commandments, for example, advise against specific acts. Conversely, a positive right informs us about behaviour we are obliged or ought to do, such as holding a door for someone unable to do so for themselves. Both types of rights entail duty. For example, whenever S has a right to do x, we can say that R has a duty (or obligation) either not to interfere or to assist with S's right to do x. The negative right of the patient, which the physician must observe, is manifested as a duty of non-interference. When we speak of a patient's right of informed consent, we assert that the physician has a duty not to interfere with a patient's autonomous decision. Physician interference may take several forms, such as personal bias towards a particular medical treatment, coercion, and persuasion. If patient autonomy is not preserved, the power to coerce and the force of physician paternalism may expose the patient to greater harm--an action diametrically opposed to the principle of "noharm" implicit in the Hippocratic Oath. However, a physician is obliged to ensure that a patient provides informed consent for a medical treatment by determining whether the patient has made an autonomous decision. Yet, a patient can only exercise autonomy when both the physician and the patient meet specific conditions.

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions For Informed Consent

Necessary Conditions

Generally, a necessary condition means that whenever an effect B occurs, A must also occur. For example, if a forest burns, combustible material must have been present, as well as oxygen. In the medical context, a legal document must be signed for an informed consent to occur. However, the consent form alone is not a sufficient condition for obtaining a truly informed consent because a patient has positive rights that must be adequately addressed. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Decision Procedure for Achieving an Informed Consent
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.