Divergences in an Expansive Discipline: How Should We Study Christian Ethics?

By Hicks, Jane | Currents in Theology and Mission, October 2012 | Go to article overview

Divergences in an Expansive Discipline: How Should We Study Christian Ethics?


Hicks, Jane, Currents in Theology and Mission


Many in the mainline churches lament the growth of divine-command moral reasoning common among conservative Evangelicals. Increasingly, the popular American imagination equates Christian ethics with following rules. This type of moral reasoning is overly simplistic and, when premised upon a dictation-theory biblicism, problematic for its use of scripture. It also avoids full personal responsibility for moral discernment, leaving us with a truncated sense of human agency. If the churches are to do better, we must consider how we are educated in moral thought and practice.

How should we train for Christian leadership? To broach this question, I will start with a few contours of the academic discipline, how morality is incorporated into the curriculum at universities, colleges, and leading ecumenical divinity schools. My hope is to put forward a range of options from which to think about the study of ethics. Based on these observations, I conclude with several base points for the study of Christian ethics within the shifting landscape of church and society.

Christian Ethics as an Academic Discipline

Preliminary Definitions

All of us in the churches and in our educational institutions do Christian ethics in some fashion. This is true if we have any claim on the notion of Christianity. To be sure, Christian ethics is not the province of ethicists alone. Christian ethics is well-represented in the curriculum across biblical studies, practical and systematic theology, and church history, as well as holistically by particular institutions. Still, there is a separate discipline that has long-standing in the academy called "Christian Ethics." What is this discipline and how should we engage it here?

The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Ethics describes the modern Protestant enterprise in terms of a series of influential scholars beginning with Karl Barth and ending with the likes of Roger Shinn. (1) However, the entry provides no single coherent picture of ethical inquiry. This non-definition points to a central challenge in the history of the field. I call this challenge "Potter's lament," as it was first articulated by a longtime teacher of Christian Ethics at Harvard Divinity School, Ralph Potter.

Potter's Lament

In the 1970s, leading scholars in the field--Jim Gustafson, Ralph Potter, Joe Hough, and Jim Childress, among others--anticipated a crisis of purpose and workability in the study of Christian ethics. For a time, their debates dominated the confines of the Ethics Section of the American Academy of Religion and the then newly established Journal of Religious Ethics. What should we be doing as ethicists? Their conversations set the stage for the discipline for years afterward. Only subsequently would "non-white-male" voices emerge to weigh-in and tip the scales in these conversations. However, the issues outlined then continue to vex ethicists today when thinking about how best to teach and practice.

Ralph Potter began: 'Among professional practitioners of Christian Social Ethics in the United States today there is relatively little agreement concerning the nature of the ... discipline, the intellectual tools necessary to perform it, and the scope of ... responsibility for the guidance and stimulation of Christian social action. Some accentuate the qualifier, 'Christian'; others place stress upon the second modifier, 'social.'" (2) Note the problems he signals: diffusion of responsibility, methodological confusion, and questions of audience and accountability.

Happily, most in this group agreed that Christian ethics is a "practical discipline," in the instrumental sense. That is, it is concerned with what is right and just, but also with action. Ethics means both knowing and doing. This early consensus on the practical nature of Christian ethics elicited even greater concern about its breadth. Such a broad view of the field extends responsibility to all Christian agency. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Divergences in an Expansive Discipline: How Should We Study Christian Ethics?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.