Vigilance Fatigue in Policing: A Critical Threat to Public Safety and Officer Well-Being
Krause, Meredith, The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin
In the decade since 9/11, terrorism has entered the information age to challenge the work of first responders, police managers, and decision makers. The attacks raised fundamental questions about America's safety and resulted in a renewed focus on domestic security. In turn it fostered an emphasis on proactive and preventive, rather than reactive, strategies to combat terrorist threats.
The absence of a subsequent major attack on U.S. soil over the past decade has contributed to a renewed sense of security. However, the emergence of competing crises, like the global economic crisis and domestic recession, has brought about a reexamination of the sustain-ability, credibility, and utility of many post-9/11 security strategies. While this effort has attempted to balance security needs with the limitations posed by budgets, legal requirements, public support, and threats to U.S. interests, it has overlooked a critical risk to effective threat analysis and management. This phenomenon is described best as "vigilance fatigue," or the failure to accurately perceive, identify, or analyze bona fide threats due to 1) prolonged exposure to ambiguous, unspecified, and ubiquitous threat information; 2) information overload; 3) overwhelming pressure to maintain exceptional, en-or-free performance; and 4) faulty strategies for structuring informed decision making under conditions of uncertainty and stress. (1)
DEFINING THE CONCEPT
Vigilance fatigue threatens persons and organizations tasked with processing large amounts of data, identifying risks or irregularities, and responding to perceived threats. A comprehensive review of medical, law enforcement, and business literature reveals only passing acknowledgements of this concept. The few existing references associate vigilance fatigue with errors in decision making due to physical fatigue or "change blindness," described as a failure to recognize data changes because of continual scanning by eye.' While the concept of vigilance fatigue proves worthy of further development, its complexity and relevance to policing, intelligence, and military operations have yet to be explored.
A full definition of vigilance fatigue must consider an array of closely associated skills, abilities, and behaviors, all of which contribute to a capacity for sustained vigilance in dynamic environments. This recognizes the ways in which attention, situational awareness, and decision-making processes affect the concept's functionality. These attentional resources include capacity for selective attention and alternating attention, often limited by working, memory abilities and the presence of distractions. A model of sustained vigilance (figure 1) also points to the ways in which cognitive biases and reliance upon heuristics may degrade vigilance and jeopardize accurate threat detection and assessment, especially when someone faces excessive or questionable information. (3)
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
DESCRIBING AND UNDERSTANDING VIGILANCE FATIGUE
A range of factors contribute to a person's immunity to vigilance fatigue. These include the issues or aspects unique to the individual engaged in monitoring, the context in which this undertaking occurs, and the nature of the task itself. Based on a review of research in the areas of cognitive psychology, social psychology and group dynamics, decision making and risk assessment, signal detection theory, and human ergonomics, figure 2 summarizes the factors that may foster vigilance fatigue.
Individual/lntrapersonal Contextual/Environmental Task-Specific Factors Factors Factors * Boredom proneness * Access to tools * (Factors that typically designed to support Information/data increase the risk of information processing overload (Factors vigilance fatigue) and decision making that typically * Extended span of (Factors that typically increase the risk attention (Factors that decrease the risk for of vigilance typically decrease the vigilance fatigue) fatigue) risk for vigilance * Stress and arousal * Low base rate fatigue) level (Factor that (rare) targets/ * Smooth visual require careful balancing outcomes (Factors scanning/pattern because extremes will that typically recognition skills contribute to compromised increase the risk (Factors that typically vigilance) of vigilance decrease the risk for * Adequate fatigue) vigilance fatigue) staffing/resource levels * Time pressure * Reliance upon cognitive (Factors that typically to complete task heuristics (Factors that decrease the risk for (Factors that typically increase the vigilance fatigue) typically risk of vigilance * Thoughtful shiftwork increase the risk fatigue) management (Factors that of vigilance * Risk tolerance (Factor typically decrease the fatigue) that require careful risk for vigilance * Presence of balancing because fatigue) complex data/ extremes will contribute * Presence of groupthink tasking (Factors to compromised ((Factors that typically that typically vigilance) increase the risk of increase the risk * Subject matter vigilance fatigue)) of vigilance expertise (Factor that * Group/office cohesion fatigue) require careful balancing (Factors that typically * Level of task because extremes will decrease the risk for monotony contribute to compromised vigilance fatigue) ((Factors that vigilance) * Management support (top typically * Negative affect (e. …