Constitutional Law - First Amendment - Compelled Commercial Speech - D.C. Circuit Holds That FDA Rule Mandating Graphic Warning Images on Cigarette Packaging and Advertisements Violates First Amendment

Harvard Law Review, January 2013 | Go to article overview

Constitutional Law - First Amendment - Compelled Commercial Speech - D.C. Circuit Holds That FDA Rule Mandating Graphic Warning Images on Cigarette Packaging and Advertisements Violates First Amendment


CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FIRST AMENDMENT--COMPELLED COMMERCIAL SPEECH--D.C. CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT FDA RULE MANDATING GRAPHIC WARNING IMAGES ON CIGARETTE PACKAGING AND ADVERTISEMENTS VIOLATES FIRST AMENDMENT.--R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Food & Drug Administration, 696 F.3d 1205 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

In 2009, Congress granted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory authority over tobacco products through the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (1) (Tobacco Control Act). The Act requires, among other things, that the FDA issue a rule selecting "color graphics depicting the negative health consequences of smoking." (2) These graphic warnings, together with nine new textual warnings drafted by Congress, are required to appear on the top half of all cigarette packaging and on twenty percent of the area of print advertisements. (3) The tobacco industry swiftly launched legal challenges. (4) Recently, in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. FDA, (5) a divided D.C. Circuit panel held that the FDA's final rule (6) violated the First Amendment. (7) The court's decision relied on a plausible but undesirably narrow interpretation of a key precedent that governs compelled commercial disclosures. This precedent did not preordain the majority's determination of the governmental interests at stake in the FDA's rule, or its analysis of the misleading or deceptive nature of the tobacco advertising targeted by the rule. A broader interpretation would have maintained principled limits on the government's ability to mandate commercial disclosures, while more faithfully honoring the commercial speech doctrine's central concern: that consumers' decisions "be intelligent and well informed." (8)

For nearly fifty years, the federal government has required some form of health warning on tobacco packaging and advertisements. (9) Congress passed the Tobacco Control Act in part to reform the warning language that had not been updated since 1984, (10) which Congress found insufficiently apprised consumers of the scope and severity of smoking's negative health consequences. (11) While certain segments of the population properly understand smoking's health risks and the content of the required warning labels, the FDA found that adolescents and people with less education significantly underestimate the dangers of smoking and fail to fully comprehend text-only warning messages. (12) Congress also found that "[v]irtually all new users of tobacco products are under the minimum legal age to purchase such products," and that "[t]obacco advertising and marketing contribute significantly to the use of nicotine-containing tobacco products by adolescents." (13) On June 22, 2011, the FDA issued its final rule with new text and image warning requirements for cigarette packaging and advertising. (14)

On August 16, 2011, five tobacco companies filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the FDA, claiming the graphic warning images rule violated the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act. (15) On February 29, 2012, Judge Leon held that the rule violated the First Amendment by "unconstitutionally compelling speech." (16) Judge Leon first noted that "compelled speech is 'presumptively unconstitutional,'" (17) and is typically subjected to strict scrutiny. He acknowledged that exceptions exist in "the arena of compelled commercial speech" (18) and described the standard of review the Supreme Court set out in Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel. (19) In Zauderer, the Court held that requirements to disclose factual commercial information would be subjected to something resembling rational basis review: to pass constitutional muster, the requirements must be "reasonably related to the State's interest in preventing deception of consumers." (20) Finding that the graphic warnings requirement was not akin to the disclosure in Zauderer, Judge Leon instead subjected the graphic warnings to strict scrutiny, which they did not survive. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Constitutional Law - First Amendment - Compelled Commercial Speech - D.C. Circuit Holds That FDA Rule Mandating Graphic Warning Images on Cigarette Packaging and Advertisements Violates First Amendment
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.