The Supremacy Clause as Structural Safeguard of Federalism: State Judges and International Law in the Post-Erie Era

By Halabi, Sam Foster | Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

The Supremacy Clause as Structural Safeguard of Federalism: State Judges and International Law in the Post-Erie Era


Halabi, Sam Foster, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law


Against a backdrop of state constitutional and legislative initiatives aimed at limiting judicial use of international law, this Article argues that state judges have, by and large, interpreted treaties and customary international law so as to narrow their effect on state law-making prerogatives. Where state judges have used international law more liberally, they have done so to give effect to state executive and legislative objectives. Not only does this thesis suggest that the trend among state legislatures to limit state judges' use of international law is self-defeating, it also gives substance to a relatively unexplored structural safeguard of federalism: state judges' authority under the Supremacy Clause to harmonize treaties and customary international law with state constitutional, legislative, and common law, and to influence federal jurisprudence on the scope and effect of binding international law. The Supremacy Clause empowers state judges to adapt international law to maximize benefits for--and minimize disruptions to-state policy objectives. As more areas of traditional state authority are displaced by international law, state judicial management of international law may be the strongest structural protection for state interests.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
I. THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE, STATE JUDGES AND
     INTERNATIONAL LAW

II. CIVIL PROCEDURE
     A. Hague Service Convention
        1. State Judicial Limitation of the Treaty's Scope
        2. State Judicial Expansion of Alternative Means of Service to
           Facilitate Access to State Courts
     B. Hague Evidence Convention
        1. State Judicial Circumscription of the Treaty: the First
           Resort Rule
        2. Using the Hague Evidence Treaty to Give Effect to
           Plaintiffs' Choice of State Forum

III. CONTRACTS
     A. Contracts which Specify both a State Forum and Choice of
        International Law
     B. U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of
        Goods

IV. CRIMINAL LAW
     A. Valdez v. State: Incorporating Evidentiary, but not
        Preemptive, Effects from the Vienna Convention on Consular
        Relations
     B. Torres v. State: Defining "Prejudice" under the Vienna
        Convention on Consular Relations under State, not Federal
        or International, Law

IV. FAMILY LAW
     A. Hague Abduction Convention
     B. The Hague Abduction Convention as a Lesson in the Judicial
        and Political Safeguards of Federalism

V. CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

For most of American history, U.S. states have maintained an ambivalent relationship with international law. After they successfully cooperated in their military rejection of British rule, the states welcomed the attributes of sovereignty transferred to them under the law of nations as it existed in 1783. (1) In the early post-war period, however, the states used their sovereign powers in ways that strained the unity of the new confederation. (2)

   After the War for Independence, [t]he "States passed tariff laws
   against one another as well as against foreign nations; and,
   indeed, as far as commerce was concerned, each State treated the
   others as foreign nations. There were retaliations,
   discriminations, and every manner of trade restrictions and
   impediments which local ingenuity and selfishness could devise."
   Disputes between the States over border lands and overlapping land
   grants generated as much, if not more, hostility ... including
   periodic border skirmishes between settlers from different States.
   And conflicting claims to lucrative prize ships and spoils of war
   seized on the high seas were yet another source of high tension
   among the States. (3)

Although the Articles of Confederation prohibited states from entering into any "agreement, alliance or treaty" with foreign powers and, separately, provided that "no two or more States shall enter into any treaty, confederation or alliance whatever between them, without the consent of [Congress]," (4) the states regarded the Articles themselves as a treaty among sovereigns. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Upgrade your membership to receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad‑free environment

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Supremacy Clause as Structural Safeguard of Federalism: State Judges and International Law in the Post-Erie Era
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved in your active project from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.