Conspiracy or Confusion? Abortion Politics in Britain

By Bristow, Jennie | Conscience, Spring 2013 | Go to article overview

Conspiracy or Confusion? Abortion Politics in Britain


Bristow, Jennie, Conscience


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

WHEN THE CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL DEMOCRAT COALITION GOVERNMENT took power in May 2010, abortion providers and prochoice advocates in Britain were not unduly concerned. Abortion is not a "party political" issue in Britain: amendments to the abortion law are made according to a free vote to allow Members of Parliament (MPs) to vote according to their personal views rather than the "party line," and opinion polls suggest that Conservative voters are just as supportive of women's ability to have an abortion when they need one as are Labour voters. Nevertheless, the last two years have proven that abortion access, although alive and well in Britain, is not an immutable fact.

A poll conducted in 2011 by the market research company Ipsos MORI for the UK nonprofit abortion provider British Pregnancy Advisory Service (bpas), backed up the idea that abortion views cannot be predicted by party identification. The poll found that those who intended to vote Conservative were slightly more likely to agree with the statement "A woman should not have to continue with her pregnancy if she wants an abortion" and the least likely to disagree (59 percent and 16 percent respectively). This is in comparison to those who intended to vote Labour (58 percent agreed, 20 percent disagreed), while of Liberal Democrat voters, only 47% agreed with the statement.

Among politicians, there are similar variations of opinion. For example, in July 2012 Amber Rudd, the Conservative MP for Hastings who describes herself as "unequivocally prochoice," announced that she was setting up a cross-party inquiry into unwanted pregnancy. Referring to Nadine Dorries, the Conservative MP for mid-Bedfordshire who recently made some high-profile attempts to limit women's access to abortion, Rudd noted that "people think Nadine Dorries is the voice of the government because her voice is heard." Rudd went on to say that if the outcome of the new inquiry "is to change people's perception and make it clear that we are prowoman and prochoice then that is a fantastic by product."

In Britain today, women's need for abortion remains both publicly and

politically accepted. It is important to emphasize this context because events of the past two years have often made it appear as though abortion access is under serious threat. Abortion providers have faced a barrage of attacks on their businesses and reputations, and those working in the field have had to expend a great deal of time and energy fighting slurs and defending their practices. In other words, abortion provision has been simultaneously accepted by the mainstream and viciously attacked by senior figures in and around government. How do we explain this?

CONSPIRACY OR CONFUSION?

Perhaps the clearest indicator that something strange and unpredictable has happened to the British abortion debate has been the influence of Nadine Dorries on recent debates. Dottles, no stranger to the abortion issue, had previously conducted zealous campaigns to bring the "time limit"' for abortion down from 24 weeks' gestation to 20 weeks. In 2011 she, along with the Labour MP Frank Field, tabled an amendment to the Health and Social Care Bill--a significant bill that brought about a major reorganization of the entire National Health Service--calling for abortion providers to be stripped of their ability to provide "information and counseling" to women seeking an abortion. Dorries and Field argued that a "conflict of interest" occurred when independent abortion providers (primarily, charities such as bpas and Marie Stopes International) provided information and advice. They argued that these organizations "profit" from providing abortions and thus have a "vested interest" in encouraging women to end their pregnancies rather than keep the baby or allow the child to be adopted.

Abortion providers fought back against these allegations. The Dorries-Field amendment was eventually exposed as a tactic designed to restrict women's access to abortion, and when the House of Commons came to vote, the amendment failed spectacularly--118 votes to 368. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Conspiracy or Confusion? Abortion Politics in Britain
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.