Changes in the Fed's Pricing Policies Appear to Have Helped Eliminate Its Unfair Advantages, GAO Study Says

By Rosenstein, Jay | American Banker, April 12, 1984 | Go to article overview

Changes in the Fed's Pricing Policies Appear to Have Helped Eliminate Its Unfair Advantages, GAO Study Says


Rosenstein, Jay, American Banker


WASHINGTON -- Congressional investigators reported Wednesday that recent changes in check-processing charges and services by the Federal Reserve Board appear to have eliminated key advantages the Fed had over private sector competitors.

An outline of the findings from the General Accounting Office were presented at a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Fed pricing policies.

Many banks, particularly large ones, have argued that the Fed has an unfair competitive advantage in providing payments services.

In its first annual report on pricing policies, the Fed this week outlined additional changes that may possibly be made this year. However, the Fed stressed in the report that fewer modifications in prices or service levels are expected in 1984 than were made in the two previous years.

At the Senate Banking Committee hearing Wednesday, William J. Anderson, director of the general government division of the GAO, said that at the start of 1983, Fed prices were low enough to confer a subsidy on its users, to the disadvantage of competitors.

But the GAO study shows that this changed during last year, he said, when the Fed began pricing check float, increased its prices, and altered the mix of services.

"Average revenue per check increased by 38% over the course of the year," the GAO official told the committee. "There no longer appears to be a subsidy in the pricing of Federal Reserve check-clearing services," he said in describing the "bottom line" of the GAO findings.

The Fed's performance also was defended by E. Gerald Corrigan, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

But as expected, Barry Sullivan, chairman and chief executive officer of the First National Bank of Chicago, told the committee that Congress must redefine the Fed's role in the national payments system. He said the Fed's dominant share of payment processing and its "conflicting roles are as rulemaker and service vendor" are among the reasons that the Fed is not "just another competitor" and that its duties must be redefined by Congress.

Mr. Sullivan, testifying on behalf of the more than 50 banks in the National Payments System Coalition, suggested that among other things Congress consider limiting the Fed's share of any core payment service to no more than 50%, with the rest to go to private providers.

Both Mr. Sullivan and Christopher J. Murphy 3d, a South Bend, Inc., banker testifying on behalf of the American Bankers Association, recommended that the Fed periodically disclose to the public its long-term plans for competing in payments services.

In general, the ABA witness said, the group agreed that the Fed has made significant strides to improve private sector competition but that more needs to be done. The Changes Slated for '84

O. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Changes in the Fed's Pricing Policies Appear to Have Helped Eliminate Its Unfair Advantages, GAO Study Says
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.