Broadening the Reach of Chapter III: The Institutional Integrity of State Courts and the Constitutional Limits of State Legislative Power

By Ratnapala, Suri; Crowe, Jonathan | Melbourne University Law Review, April 2012 | Go to article overview

Broadening the Reach of Chapter III: The Institutional Integrity of State Courts and the Constitutional Limits of State Legislative Power


Ratnapala, Suri, Crowe, Jonathan, Melbourne University Law Review


[This article reviews the High Court's emerging jurisprudence on the institutional integrity of state courts. It begins by surveying the Court's recent decisions in this area. The authors argue that these decisions can usefully be placed into four interrelated categories, concerning the constitution of state courts, impermissible grants of jurisdiction, impermissible withdrawal of jurisdiction and procedural guarantees. After summarising the central principles arising from the rulings, the authors consider four possible broader implications, focusing particularly on Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales. It is argued that Kirk has potentially wideranging implications for the powers of state legislatures to restrict judicial review and modify the requirements of natural justice.]

CONTENTS

I   Introduction
II  The Constitution of a Court
III Impermissible Jurisdiction
    A Control Orders
    B Declarations of Incompatibility
IV  Withdrawal of Jurisdiction
V   Procedural Guarantees
    A Confidentiality of Criminal Intelligence
    B Suppression Orders
    C Ex Parte Orders
VI  Broader Implications
    A Jurisdiction of Inferior Courts and Tribunals
    B Errors of Law Affecting Jurisdiction
    C The Right to Factual Particulars
    D Denial of Natural Justice
VII Conclusion

I INTRODUCTION

It has been the longstanding judicial view, repeatedly affirmed by state supreme courts, the High Court and the Privy Council, that the doctrine of the separation of powers is not constitutionally entrenched at state level. (1) This orthodox view, we argue, no longer represents the constitutional law of Australia following a series of judgments of the High Court commencing with Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) ('Kable'). (2) The High Court declared in Kable that state and federal courts form an integrated hierarchy and, for that reason, that state legislatures do not have unrestricted power to alter the constitution, jurisdiction or procedures of state courts. In that case, the High Court invalidated New South Wales legislation that empowered the Supreme Court to order the continued detention of a named prisoner beyond his imposed prison sentence, not on the grounds of violating the law but on account of the likely danger he posed to others.

In the words of Gaudron J in Kable, s 5 of the Community Protection Act 1994 (NSW) 'makes a mockery of [the judicial] process' and

   because the judicial process is a defining feature of the judicial
   power of the Commonwealth, the Act weakens confidence in the
   institutions which comprise the judicial system brought into
   existence by Ch Ill of the Constitution. (3)

McHugh J remarked that although the separation of powers doctrine was inapplicable to the states, 'in some situations the effect of Ch III of the Constitution may lead to the same result as if the State had an enforceable doctrine of separation of powers.' (4)

Two High Court cases decided after Kable--Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld) ('Fardon') (5) and Baker v The Queen ('Baker') (6)--upheld state laws that empowered the respective supreme courts to order further detention not of named individuals, but of categories of offenders considered to endanger society. These decisions prompted Kirby J to wonder in 2004 whether Kable was 'a constitutional guard-dog that would bark but once'. (7) This was not strictly true at the time, as the Supreme Court of Queensland had applied the Kable rule to invalidate legislation dealing with the proceeds of crime, (8) an implication later confirmed by the High Court. (9) At any rate, it is certainly not true now, given the recent proliferation of cases on institutional integrity considered in this article.

This article reviews the current state of the High Court's jurisprudence on institutional integrity. We begin by surveying the Court's recent decisions in this area. We argue that these decisions can usefully be placed into four interrelated categories. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Broadening the Reach of Chapter III: The Institutional Integrity of State Courts and the Constitutional Limits of State Legislative Power
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.