Sentencing in Germany: Explaining Long-Term Stability in the Structure of Criminal Sanctions and Sentencing

By Albrecht, Hans-Jorg | Law and Contemporary Problems, Winter 2013 | Go to article overview

Sentencing in Germany: Explaining Long-Term Stability in the Structure of Criminal Sanctions and Sentencing


Albrecht, Hans-Jorg, Law and Contemporary Problems


I

INTRODUCTION

In the last decades, much has been written on significant changes in the use of prison sentences and imprisonment. These changes are assumed to reflect growing punitiveness and a rapidly spreading demand for public protection through long periods of confinement. In particular, the heavy inflation of the U.S. prison population has triggered scholarly attempts to explain an apparently insatiable appetite for imprisonment. (1) Only marginal attention has been paid to the question of why consistency in sentencing, stability in sentencing outcomes, and a modest use of imprisonment can be observed in certain countries more than in others. For example, remarkable stability in the structure of criminal sanctions has been on display in Germany since the end of the 1960s, when a major law amendment gave priority to fines and significantly restricted the use of prison sentences. Since the end of the 1960s, now a period of four decades, four out of five criminal sanctions imposed by German criminal courts are day fines. (2) Although some variation in rates of imprisonment can be observed over the last forty years in Germany, upward and downward swings have been limited. Criminal court statistics also show that the bulk of criminal sentences fall in the lower third of the range of sentences carried by criminal offense statutes. In spite of a statutory framework of sentencing that does not provide effective guidance for judges, consistency and stability are evidently achieved through channels other than authoritative sentencing guidelines. At first glance, it seems that significant restraints are at work in the sentencing process that prevent the use of protracted prison sentences as a punitive and deterrent response, and those restraints are unaffected by the rhetoric of German politicians--like that of their peers elsewhere--in favor of punitive responses to crime. (3)

A first clue in the analysis of what might serve as a restraint can be found in discourses originating in German politics about broadening the range of preventive detention (Sicherungsverwahrung) as a response to dangerous offenders. (4) Germany was on trial before the European Court of Human Rights on several occasions over the last two years, facing allegations of violations of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the introduction of a retroactive security measure allowing indeterminate (and possibly lifelong) preventive detention for offenders deemed dangerous (particularly violent and sexual offenders). (5) In the court hearings, the German Federal Ministry of Justice presented an interesting argument to the European Court. The Ministry of Justice lawyers argued that this type of security measure (preventive detention for dangerous habitual offenders) was contributing to the relatively low imprisonment rate observed in Germany. (6) Elaborating along this line of reasoning, Winfried Hassemer has argued that the advances in sentencing doctrine and sentencing theory--as well as corresponding standards of reasoning, transparency, and accountability imposed on trial courts by appellate courts and the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof)--have resulted in concentrating the political pursuit of security on this "second track" of criminal sanctions focused on preventive detention instead of personal guilt. (7) In fact, imprisonment rates have been on the decline in Germany for at least a decade, and in some German states this decline is so marked that prison capacity has had to be reduced significantly. The General Accounting Office of the State of Hamburg recently advised the state government to respond to the dramatic decline in the Hamburg prison population by adjusting the prison budget and reducing the prison capacity accordingly. (8)

The argument brought forward in favor of preventive detention is based on a logic of guilt-dependent criminal punishment, restricting not only the imposition of a criminal sentence, but also the length of a prison sentence. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sentencing in Germany: Explaining Long-Term Stability in the Structure of Criminal Sanctions and Sentencing
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.