Debate on Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission

By Abrams, Floyd; Morrison, Alan B. et al. | Albany Law Review, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

Debate on Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission

Abrams, Floyd, Morrison, Alan B., Collins, Ronald K. L., Albany Law Review

MR. RONALD COLLINS: One of the joys of getting older is the experiencing of the gracious words of the young, however exaggerated.

That said, Benjamin, I very sincerely appreciate those kind words, and I only wish my mother were here to hear them.

It is a great pleasure, indeed it is an honor, to be at Robert Jackson's Law School, and I want to especially thank Dean Andrews, the faculty here, and most of all, I see the Editor-in-Chief over there in the corner, of the Albany Law Review, for making this event possible. And it's really quite a program, and I'm delighted and honored to be a part of it.

I have already had the pleasure of meeting some of the faculty, and I look forward to meeting more, including people outside of my field. Just yesterday I had the opportunity to chat with some people from Tax--from Tax Law and Trust and Estates, and I welcome the opportunity to meet people who work outside of my field. Who knows, I may actually learn something. I'm always looking forward to doing that.

Before I begin, at least say a few things about the exchange that will take place today.

I have a noted nod of recognition to at least three members of this faculty, whose works over the years I have been the beneficiary of. Of course, there'd be more, but three came to mind.

Paul Finkelman, who I gather is not here today, for his incredible work in legal history and Constitutional Law. I have read, and continue to read his works.

Vince Bonventre, vehemently an expert on State Constitutional Law, and many years ago, we tilled those fields together, and it's so wonderful to be back at this law school, here with Vince, who I haven't seen in a long time.

And Professor Stephen Gottlieb, whose works in Constitutional Law and jurisprudence I have learned much from over the years.

So I'd like to just recognize that, and say it's just an honor to be here with them today.

And, of course, Benjamin, what this young man has done is remarkable. I did not plan to come to this conference, I just had too much to do, but he wowed me in more ways than one. And if a genuine passion for the law, combined with a divining commitment to excellence is the measure, then he is the man, and I know I speak for all of us in extending a sincere---our sincere appreciation for all the work that Benjamin has done, so Benjamin...


MR. COLLINS: I am honored and humbled to be the middleman, literally and figuratively, between two legal giants in our profession: Floyd Abrams and Alan Morrison, both of whom I have known for many years.

One of them is the leading authority on First Amendment law. If you ask anyone in our profession to name a First Amendment lawyer, they would name Floyd Abrams. Without a doubt. If you asked them to name two, they're hard pressed. Such has life come to be, Floyd.

In the area of Public Interest Law, there are few names, if any, to rival the achievements of Alan Morrison. Just last night I discovered that on the D.C. Court of Appeals Historical Society's website, there was this incredible profile, replete with interviews of the work that Alan Morrison has done over the years, and I'll tell you, anybody who remembers the name Louis Brandeis, it is without exaggeration to say that he is the embodiment of that man in our own time. So it's a great pleasure to be here with Floyd and everyone today.

The occasion for this exchange between these two distinguished lawyers is, of course, the U.S. Supreme Court's controversial ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. (1) With that case, the First Amendment once again became the center of controversy in the cultural wars that define this nation.

Not since the flag desecration cases of the late 1980s and early 1990s (2) and the proposed constitutional amendments following them, have we seen anything in the First Amendment area quite as divisive as the Court's 2010 campaign finance ruling. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Debate on Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.