Remarks by Fionnuala Ni Aolain

By Aolain, Fionnuala Ni | Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law, Annual 2012 | Go to article overview

Remarks by Fionnuala Ni Aolain


Aolain, Fionnuala Ni, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law


My comments are directed first at the utility of a jus post bellum framework in tackling post-conflict contexts and transitions. My remarks in this regard focus on what may be obscured in the move to using a new conceptual placeholder in contexts where we might first ascertain what law we have now, how effective it is, and what augmentation if any is required. Second, I discuss the terminology of terrorism and what the use of this linguistic, conceptual, and legal scaffold achieves. Finally, I use the specific example of Northern Ireland to ground some reflections on the utility of the terrorism and jus post bellum frameworks.

FRAMEWORKS

I suggest that the pressing legal conversation concerning contemporary conflict should be less about the utility of developing a new framework of jus post bellum, but rather should focus on the legal question of identifying and then managing the legal status of armed conflict. This is in some ways a preliminary and old-fashioned step--one historically avoided by states in the context of internal armed conflict. Let me suggest that it is in significant part the failure, inability, or lack of incentives for states to "call" the status of conflict that leads to a plethora of unresolved legal and political issues both during peace agreement negotiations and in the aftermath of conflict. (1) Situations which broadly constitute internal armed conflicts, whether of the Common Article 3 or the Protocol II variety, are also the sites where an overlap with a terrorism categorization is most likely to occur. These conflicts are also persistently associated with the most egregious human rights violations, characterized by inept and/or insufficient governance and increasingly requiring various forms of international and regional intervention.

A review of state practice post-World War II reveals that states confronted with internal insurgency, sizeable communal violence, or persistent low-level violence from a constant source will tirelessly claim that the problem faced is simply one of internal criminal or terrorist behavior, activating only the application of human rights law and domestic emergency law responses. By and large then, the negative precursor that frames the challenges we confront in the post-conflict environment is, I submit, one in which the law of war has been excluded or evacuated from the prior legal and political conversations. Many of these jurisdictions are in persistent derogation of international human rights treaties--and often fall within the category of permanent emergencies under national and international law. (2) In practice, there is a particularly high correlation between what I term "high-intensity" emergencies and situations of low-intensity internal armed conflict. As a result, the emergency label is maneuvered by governments to cover up extreme internal disorder, illegitimacy, or claims on the coherence of the state. The emergency claim may, at its extreme, become the chimera for regime illegitimacy. Moreover, the prolonged suspension of normal protections for citizens is often inimical to the original rationale for allowing states to limit the exercise of certain human rights. A failure to adequately distinguish the kind of armed conflict (or the prescient reality of conflict) taking place allows for a kind of slippage both in terms of the legal obligations owed by the parties (state and nonstate actors alike) and the limitations that follow for framing the end of the conflict--specifically on what legal basis endings can be negotiated. This substantially affects the resolution of issues in the post conflict setting--including but not limited to amnesty, truth recovery processes, accountability, reparations, security sector reform, and reconciliation.

Therefore, I suggest that a basic but critical step before we rush to create a new place holder in the post-conflict arena is to seek clarity on the legal and factual requirements that activate the applicability of international humanitarian law to low-intensity or persistent internal armed conflict. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Remarks by Fionnuala Ni Aolain
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.