The Chevron-Ecuador Case: Three Dimensions of Complexity in Transnational Dispute Resolution

By Whytock, Christopher A. | Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law, Annual 2012 | Go to article overview

The Chevron-Ecuador Case: Three Dimensions of Complexity in Transnational Dispute Resolution


Whytock, Christopher A., Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law


INTRODUCTION

The Chevron/Ecuador case is in many ways unique. Nevertheless, it illustrates a general trend toward greater inter-state, inter-systemic, and doctrinal complexity in transnational dispute resolution.

INTER-STATE COMPLEXITY

Inter-state complexity is complexity that arises when a dispute has connections to more than one state. The Chevron/Ecuador case has connections to both the United States and Ecuador, and these connections have created difficult issues regarding the proper forum, the proper law, and the domestic effect of foreign judgments. These issues are nothing new. But transnational litigation is becoming increasingly multipolar in ways that are likely to make these issues more frequent and complex than ever. (1)

For example, the plaintiffs in the Chevron/Ecuador case originally filed their suit in a U.S. court, but the court dismissed the suit in favor of Ecuador on forum non conveniens grounds. The plaintiffs refiled the suit in an Ecuadorian court, which heard the merits of the case and ultimately issued a multi-billion dollar judgment against Chevron.

This aspect of the Chevron/Ecuador case illustrates what seems to be a broader trend: while U.S. courts are decreasingly open to transnational claims, other countries' courts are increasingly open to them. Data collected by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts suggest that since at least the mid-1990s, the number of transnational contract and tort claims filed in U.S. federal courts has been declining. (2) Fewer transnational contract claims suggests that parties are negotiating fewer ex ante forum selection clauses selecting U.S. courts, and fewer transnational tort claims suggests that the world's tort plaintiffs are not as likely to forum-shop into the United States as they supposedly once were. Doctrinally, several trends might partly explain or reinforce this decline. Personal jurisdiction over non-U.S, defendants is increasingly restrictive, as the Supreme Court's recent decisions in Goodyear v. Brown and McIntyre v. Nicastro suggest. U.S. judges aggressively use the forum non conveniens doctrine to dismiss transnational suits. The Court's recent decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. indicates less willingness to apply plaintiff-favoring U.S. law extraterritorially. And the Court's decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal further reduce plaintiffs' incentives to forum-shop into U.S. courts by making it harder for them to survive the pleadings stage of litigation and gain access to a leading attraction of the U.S. legal system: permissive discovery.

Meanwhile, practitioners report that courts outside the United States are playing an increasingly assertive role in transnational dispute resolution. According to one senior transnational litigator, "actions in foreign courts are a source of increasing risk to U.S. corporations that operate abroad." (3) Others observe a growing number of countries recognizing aggregate litigation and relaxing prohibitions on contingency fee arrangements and punitive damages, making these countries' courts increasingly attractive to plaintiffs. (4)

U.S. proceedings regarding the enforceability of the Ecuadorian judgment against Chevron illustrate another aspect of the new multipolarity that may increase inter-state complexity: it appears that more foreign judgments are being brought to the United States, forcing U.S. judges and lawyers to confront a growing number of complicated issues involving foreign legal systems. Transnational litigation experts have noted the growth of foreign judgment enforcement actions in U.S. courts (5) and, although data are sparse, one empirical analysis suggests enforcement actions may indeed be on the rise. (6)

INTER-SYSTEMIC COMPLEXITY

The Chevron/Ecuador case implicates not only the domestic legal systems of Ecuador and the United States, but also the international investor-state arbitration system and a regional human rights system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Chevron-Ecuador Case: Three Dimensions of Complexity in Transnational Dispute Resolution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.