Rightly Dividing the Domestic Jihadist from the Enemy Combatant in the "War against Al-Qaeda"-Why It Matters in Rendition and Targeted Killing

By Addicott, Jeffrey F. | Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

Rightly Dividing the Domestic Jihadist from the Enemy Combatant in the "War against Al-Qaeda"-Why It Matters in Rendition and Targeted Killing


Addicott, Jeffrey F., Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law


Abstract

The confusion associated with comprehending fundamental legal concepts associated with how America conducts the "War on Terror" centers around the unwillingness of the U.S. government to properly distinguish al-Qaeda unlawful enemy combatants from domestic jihadi terrorists. If the American government cannot properly differentiate between an enemy combatant and a domestic criminal, it is little wonder that attendant legal positions associated with investigation techniques, targeted killing, arrest, detention, rendition, trial, and interrogation are subject to never-ending debate. While all al-Qaeda unlawful enemy combatants can be labeled as violent jihadists, not all violent fihadists are unlawful enemy combatants.

Without a significant about face in leadership that is willing to discern the basic difference between an unlawful enemy combatant and a domestic criminal, America's reputation will remain under a cloud of suspicion and confusion regarding the legality of our actions associated with two significant areas of critique: rendition and targeted killing vis-a-vis unlawful enemy combatants in the War on Terror.

CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

II. DEFINITIONS

    A. Global Definition of Terrorism
    B. American Definitions of Terrorism
    C. Enemy Combatant Versus Unlawful Enemy Combatant
    D. Domestic Jihadist

III. MIXED SIGNALS--BLURRING THE LINE BETWEEN DOMESTIC
      JIHADIST AND UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT

IV. TARGETED KILLING V. RENDITION

VI. CONCLUSION

I. INTRODUCTION

"Decisions about who, where and how to prosecute have always been--and must remain--the responsibility of the executive branch."(1).

--Eric Holder

With the devastating terror attacks of September 11, 2001 by al Qaeda unlawful enemy combatants(2) on the United States, terrorism is no longer exclusively just another criminal offense to be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and handed over to an Assistant U.S. Attorney for prosecution. (3) If the terror attack is carried out by an unlawful enemy combatant, the proper rule of law is not domestic criminal law, but the law of war. This simple common sense distinction is largely lost on a bilious sea of political and ideological distortion. Whatever else the eleventh anniversary of the al-Qaeda terror attacks of September 11, 2001 (4) signifies, it is unfortunate that well after the passage of a full decade there still remains great public confusion when it comes to comprehending fundamental legal concepts associated with how America conducts the War Against al-Qaeda,(5) more popularly referred to by the non-descriptive Bush-era phrase: "War on Terror."(6) While some may argue that the fault for this obfuscation rests with the lack of international consensus on relevant standards that should be adopted to deal with international terrorism(7) in asymmetric warfare,(8) or that the Bush-created phrase War on Terror itself is horribly vague,(9) the root cause of this so-called conundrum actually centers around the unwillingness of the United States government to properly distinguish al-Qaeda unlawful enemy combatant terrorists from domestic jihadi terrorists.(10)

Instead, the terms "domestic terrorist," "domestic jihadist," or just "terrorist" are frequently employed to describe all categories of actors--unlawful enemy combatants as well as common criminals-leaving both domestic and international audiences puzzled as to what should be the proper rule of law to apply to a given act of terror. If the American government cannot properly differentiate between an enemy combatant and a domestic criminal, it is little wonder that attendant legal positions associated with investigation techniques, targeted killing, arrest, detention, rendition, trial, and interrogation are subject to never-ending debate. For instance, one interesting and overriding issue that perplexes is not whether rendition or targeted killing is lawful against unlawful enemy combatants--they certainly are--but, why it is so difficult to discern the unlawful enemy combatant from the domestic criminal? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Rightly Dividing the Domestic Jihadist from the Enemy Combatant in the "War against Al-Qaeda"-Why It Matters in Rendition and Targeted Killing
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.