Developing a Written Research Productivity Policy for a Department of Accounting: A Case Study

By Walker, Kenton B.; Fleishman, Gary M. et al. | Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, September 2013 | Go to article overview

Developing a Written Research Productivity Policy for a Department of Accounting: A Case Study


Walker, Kenton B., Fleishman, Gary M., Stephenson, Teresa, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal


INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this paper is to report on experiences at the University of Wyoming, Department of Accounting in developing a written research productivity policy for use in tenure and promotion (hereafter T&P) and workload assignment decisions. We use the term research to describe faculty activities that lead to published or other written, widely-disseminated, creative works (e.g., journal articles, books, conference papers, cases, and the like) as compared to the term scholarship that might encompass a broader array of outputs. Presently, the focus of our university and college administration is on increasing the output of graduates with Ph.D.s. Although our department does not offer the doctoral degree, we are impacted by this effort in that there is a corresponding push across the institution to increase the output of basic research, hence the fact we do not consider other forms of scholarship in this paper. We discuss motivations for developing our policy document, the steps we undertook in the process, and outcomes. We hope that faculty and administrators can use our experiences, research findings, and the model we present in this paper as a starting point to develop their own policies consistent with their specific departments' missions. In addition, we suggest how use of such policies, including journal lists, may support proposed AACSB recommendations to align faculty intellectual contributions with institutional missions.

Academic institutions should conduct the T&P process with integrity, clarity, and fairness given that recruitment and retention of accounting faculty is critical to the success and mission of AACSB-accredited business schools (Johnson et al., 2002). Unfortunately, tenure-track faculty members do not generally perceive that tenure standards are clear, benchmarked, or well-communicated, which hinders perceptions of fairness. For example, the Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education, a research project at Harvard University's Graduate School of Education, recently surveyed 6,773 tenure-track faculty members at 77 institutions. The investigators asked junior faculty members about 16 institutional policies and practices designed to help them succeed. On average, none were rated even "fairly effective" and junior faculty had the least understanding about tenure standards (1) This view is consistent with that expressed by our own junior, and some senior, faculty. Given that the tenure and promotion process is one of the most important and stressful endeavors in the careers of most accounting academicians (Reinstein and Calderon, 2006; Johnson et al., 2002), clarity is important. Although most business schools evaluate accounting faculty based on the triad of teaching, scholarship, and service, recent anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests that more schools are putting added emphasis on the research component (Glover et al., 2006; Everett et al., 2003), with concomitant increasing pressures to publish in "top" academic journals (Chow et al., 2007). Some suggest that AACSB standards for academically qualified faculty are increasingly more rigorous. Even if this is not the case, it is clear that more documentation of policies and standards for scholarly activities are necessary to evaluate performance under AACSB's mission-based accreditation standards.

We organize the remainder of this paper as follows. The following section discusses our motivations for developing the written standard and the actions taken. Section three reviews literature related to contextual issues in faculty T&P evaluation of accounting research for each motivation. The fourth section discusses some potential impacts of AACSB International's Impact of Research Task Force for developing a research policy. Outcomes of the policy appear in section five. Finally, conclusions and recommendations appear in last section.

MOTIVATIONS AND ACTIONS TO DEVELOP A WRITTEN RESEARCH POLICY

Several factors motivated us to begin in 2005 to develop written research standards for our department of accounting, part of an AACSB-accredited college of business. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Developing a Written Research Productivity Policy for a Department of Accounting: A Case Study
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.