First Amendment - Deceptive Expression - Fourth Circuit Holds That Statutes Prohibiting the Unauthorized Wearing of a Military Uniform or Military Medals Do Not Violate the First Amendment

Harvard Law Review, May 2013 | Go to article overview

First Amendment - Deceptive Expression - Fourth Circuit Holds That Statutes Prohibiting the Unauthorized Wearing of a Military Uniform or Military Medals Do Not Violate the First Amendment


While the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, certain categories of expression have long been deemed outside the scope of the Amendment. (1) Various types of fraudulent speech--including perjury, impersonation of a government officer, and deceptive advertising--do not receive constitutional protection. (2) Before the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in United States v. Alvarez, (3) however, the "general constitutional status of false statements of fact" remained "murky at best." (4) The Court took a step toward resolving this uncertainty in Alvarez, where a plurality of the Justices declared the absence of "any general exception to the First Amendment for false statements." (5) Recently, in United States v. Hamilton, (6) the Fourth Circuit upheld against First Amendment challenge two federal laws (the "insignia statutes" (7)) that criminalize the unauthorized wearing of military uniforms and medals. While the court appropriately concluded that the statutes survive strict scrutiny, it departed from Supreme Court precedent by justifying the laws in part on the basis of the persuasiveness of deceptive expression, threatening to complicate further a thorny area of First Amendment law.

Several months after Michael Delos Hamilton enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps in 1961, he sustained a hand injury that resulted in his discharge and an award of monthly disability benefits by the Veterans Administration (now known as the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs) (VA). (8) In 2010, Hamilton lied about his military service after he volunteered to help with a Vietnam Veterans' Recognition Ceremony, claiming to be a combat veteran. (9) At the event, Hamilton delivered a speech dressed in the uniform of a U.S. Marine colonel, decorated with rank insignia and a number of awards and medals, none of which he had earned. (10) As a result of his appearance at the ceremony, Hamilton was charged with wearing a uniform without authorization in violation of 18 U.S.C. [section] 702 and with wearing military medals and other insignia without authorization in violation of 18 U.S.C. [section] 704(a) and (d). (11) After a jury returned a conviction, the district court sentenced Hamilton to sixteen months in prison. (12) Hamilton appealed. (13)

The Fourth Circuit affirmed. Writing for the panel, Judge Keenan (14) addressed Hamilton's "insignia convictions" for unauthorized wearing of a military uniform and medals, (15) reviewing de novo Hamilton's claim that 18 U.S.C. [section] 702 and [section] 704(a) facially violate the First Amendment. (16) Judge Keenan first addressed the scope of the insignia statutes, grouping the two laws together in her analysis. She noted that a broad reading of the statutes, which would criminalize the unauthorized wearing of military uniforms or medals "under any circumstances," (17) could pose a constitutional issue as applied to, for example, individuals who wear a military uniform as a Halloween costume or in a theatrical production. (18) The panel therefore applied the constitutional avoidance canon and construed the insignia statutes as prohibiting unauthorized wearing of military uniforms and medals only if the wearer had an intent to deceive. (19)

Next, the panel considered which level of scrutiny to apply to the challenged laws. (20) Judge Keenan observed that the government has more leeway to regulate expressive conduct--for example, burning military draft cards in antiwar protest (21)--than oral or written speech, so long as the suppression of free expression is not the government's purpose. (22) But where the governmental interest in regulating conduct is aimed at the suppression of expression, strict scrutiny--under which a statute must be necessary to serve a compelling state interest--applies. (23) She acknowledged that under the court's "intent to deceive" limiting construction, intentionally deceptive unauthorized wearing may involve expressing the false message that the individual actually earned the rank or medals displayed. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

First Amendment - Deceptive Expression - Fourth Circuit Holds That Statutes Prohibiting the Unauthorized Wearing of a Military Uniform or Military Medals Do Not Violate the First Amendment
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.