Mandatory Sentencing for People Smuggling: Issues of Law and Policy

By Trotter, Andrew; Garozzo, Matt | Melbourne University Law Review, August 2012 | Go to article overview

Mandatory Sentencing for People Smuggling: Issues of Law and Policy


Trotter, Andrew, Garozzo, Matt, Melbourne University Law Review


2 Noncompliance with Obligations under the Refugees Convention

There is a further danger that, when combined with the existing provisions on criminal responsibility, (230) the statute may attribute accessorial liability to refugees, (231) contravening the prohibition on imposing penalties on them by reason of their illegal entry or presence. (232) Accessorial liability arises where a person, knowing the essential circumstances of an offence, (233) intentionally assists or encourages (234) its commission. (235) Asylum seekers clearly encourage or assist the commission of the offence, not least by their presence on the boat throughout the voyage (236) and by paying for the offence to occur. (237) The mental element, which must be proven even for offences of strict liability, (238) requires, first, knowledge of the essential facts and circumstances of the offence, (239) and second, that the act was done for the purpose of assisting the commission of the crime and not for some other reason. (240) It is clear that those onboard the boat would have such knowledge--significantly, there is no requirement that they be aware of the illegality of the act (241)--and no other reason for their payments and presence could be reasonably inferred. (242)

No refugee has yet been charged for accessorial liability. However, it has been noted on at least one occasion that refugees as witnesses may unwittingly making incriminating admissions in response to questioning. (243) The CDPP has acknowledged that there was nothing to prevent such prosecutions, but said they were not pursued as a matter of policy. (244) That policy is not in writing, and, in the words of the prosecutor, 'may well change and evolve depending on the situation and the development of the law [and] political situations.' (245) Some witnesses have not yet been granted refugee status and so might not fall within that policy in any event. (246) The order in that case, requiring that witnesses in such a situation be given independent legal advice before testifying, (247) and the subsequent provision by the CDPP of formal indemnities (248) suggests that the court and the CDPP consider that their prosecution is legally possible. Compliance with Australia's international obligations is not a matter that should be left to prosecutorial discretion. (249) The mandatory sentencing legislation contravenes international law and is dangerously uncertain in its operation.

B Constitutional Validity

There are also concerns about the compatibility of the statutory minimum sentence with the separation of powers. (250) The separation of judicial from legislative and executive power acts not only to preserve the independence of the courts, but is also 'necessary for the protection of the individual liberty of the citizen'. (251) As stated at the Senate inquiry into the legislation, 'there is a clear argument that mandatory minimum sentences ... breach that principle by undermining the independence of the courts'. (252) The policy arguments for the imposition of mandatory minimum penalties have regularly invoked a sense of parliamentary emergency in responding to either perceived threats to border security or, more recently, to the safety of passengers aboard the vessels. However, these concerns are no justification. When mandatory penalties were enacted as part of legislation in response to a failed coup d'etat in Ceylon, the Privy Council warned that urgency could not justify incursions on the constitutional integrity of the judiciary:

   It was beset by a grave situation and it took grave measures to
   deal with it, thinking, one must presume, that it had power to do
   so and was acting rightly. But that consideration is irrelevant,
   and gives no validity to acts which infringe the Constitution. What
   is done once, if it be allowed, may be done again and in a lesser
   crisis and less serious circumstances. And thus judicial power may
   be eroded. … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Mandatory Sentencing for People Smuggling: Issues of Law and Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.