The Bee and the Sovereign? Political Entomology and the Problem of Scale

By Campana, Joseph | Shakespeare Studies, Annual 2013 | Go to article overview

The Bee and the Sovereign? Political Entomology and the Problem of Scale


Campana, Joseph, Shakespeare Studies


WITHOUT THE ANIMAL, there is no human. Or so recent work, often grouped under the rubric of animal studies, suggests. Given the bull market for animal studies across historical periods and national traditions, and given a wave of recent work that seems, at once, to consolidate a first wave of early modern animals studies and cry out for version 2.0, scholars of the age of Shakespeare and his contemporaries are left struggling with weighty questions. How can we best write about forms of life, their complex histories, and their relationships to the so-called human, which include, at a minimum, entanglement, indistinction, opposition, and indifference? What, precisely, is an animal and how useful is the concept as we consider the Renaissance?

The inadequacy of the term "animal" has been the subject of some conversation of late, most particularly in Laurie Shannon's "Eight Animals in Shakespeare; or, Before the Human," which contrasts the scarcity of use of the term "animal" in the works of William Shakespeare with "the ubiquity of those we conventionally shepherd into the enclosure of the term animals" in those works. (1) Much more common, Shannon points out, are terms such as "beast" and "creature": "In this pattern, he is typical. As the OED confirms, animal hardly appears in English before the end of the sixteenth century. What does the scarcity of this collective noun, despite the texts' menagerie, suggest about present idioms concerning the forms of life, idioms that habitually invoke a dualistic logic of human versus/and animal?" (2)

The "shepherding" Shannon refers to (itself an activity primarily concerned with animals or beasts, livestock, as opposed, say, to insects, birds, or fish), has consolidated various senses of an animal-human divide or dialectic that often makes "the animal" into "the organism against which human status was asserted" (3) or "the thing which the human is constantly setting itself against." (4) This often also implies the structure of a border or boundary in the work of Erica Fudge and of the divide or regime of distinction in the work of Bruce Boehrer and Andreas Hofele; these foundational accounts of human and animal witness the complex ways in which these borders, boundaries, divides, and distinctions are often simultaneously established and effaced creating what are often referred to as, borrowing terminology perhaps most notably deployed by Giorgio Agamben, "zones of indistinction." (5) Shannon and Hofele offer terms similarly spatial if more explicitly political in examining, respectively, early modern "zootopias" and "heterotopias." (6) To add to the list, Rebecca Ann Bach refers to an "animal continuum" while this special issue begins with the notion of a human/animal interface. (7)

And yet, neither the historical realities of terminology that Shannon describes nor the regimes of (in)distinction suggested by scholars quite explains a particular sovereignty accorded to terms like "animal" or "beast," which seem to capture all creatures while also implicitly dictating those forms of life to which attention will be directed. I would suggest not only that a complex interplay of scale and sovereignty structures the way early modernity imagined a rich world of cohabitant life forms but also that scale and sovereignty have structured the way scholars shepherd forms of life into schemas in which beast and animal constitute sovereign terms, a fact that should not be obscured by the important interrogation of human assertions of sovereignty over non-human life. To begin to understand how to unpack the claims of scale and sovereignty that often dictate to which creatures we turn our gaze, I begin with a representative moment in the works of Jacques Derrida whose writings have been central to animal studies.

When, in the first volume of his posthumously published lectures, The Beast and the Sovereign, Derrida addresses a historically extensive "political bestiary," one with deep roots in Renaissance Europe, and he proposes, as a method, a "slow and differentiated deconstruction of the logic and the dominant, classic concept of nation-state sovereignty. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Bee and the Sovereign? Political Entomology and the Problem of Scale
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.