Reverse-Rhetorical Entrapment: Naming and Shaming as a Two-Way Street

By Katzenstein, Suzanne | Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, October 2013 | Go to article overview

Reverse-Rhetorical Entrapment: Naming and Shaming as a Two-Way Street


Katzenstein, Suzanne, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law


TABLE OF CONTENTS  I.   INTRODUCTION II.  HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCACY: NAMING AND SHAMING III. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH (HRW), THE UNITED STATES, AND      TORTURE: FROM NAMING AND SHAMING TO      CONSEQUENTIALIST ARGUMENTS      A. Shaming Torture Before 9/11: The Crimes         Speak for Themselves      B. 9/11, Torture, and Consequentialist         Justifications      C. After 9/11: HRW and Consequentialist         Argumentation IV.  CONCLUSION--NORMATIVE IMPLICATIONS 

I. INTRODUCTION

"Naming and shaming," the process of exposing, publicizing, and condemning human rights abuses, is one of the most important and common strategies used by human rights advocates. In an international political system where power is typically defined in terms of military strength and market size, advocacy groups draw on a mixture of moral and legal means to pressure governments to improve their human rights behavior. In general, the mere act of naming and shaming can promote human rights norms by reinforcing the shared understanding that some types of government conduct are beyond the pale. (1)

Naming and shaming may also work more specifically through a dynamic of "rhetorical entrapment." (2) Moral and legal censure pressure the targeted government to respond to criticisms about its conduct either by expressing public support for human rights norms or by signing human rights treaties. (3) Over time, advocacy groups use such instrumental concessions to press the targeted government further to stop its abusive practices, (4) Words that initially appear to be cheap gestures can, with the passing of time, have powerful effects.

Some scholars have offered compelling analyzes of naming and shaming, including cases involving Israel's human rights policies in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in the early 1990s (5) and Uganda's repressive policies in the mid-1980s. (6) Others warn that naming and shaming can be ineffective and even backfire, moving authoritarian regimes to shift to other more discrete forms of repression. (7) Many scholars argue that the efficacy of naming and shaming depends on a range of factors, such as the regime type of the targeted government, (8) the type of actors doing the naming and shaming, (9) and the presence of domestic human rights organizations in the targeted state, (10) Finally, some scholars have shifted attention away from efficacy altogether to understand better why human rights advocates choose to shame some governments but not others. They have analyzed the effect of factors such as media reports, (11) the presence of human rights organizations in the targeted state, (12) the gravity of the human rights situation, (13) previous reporting efforts, (14) and U.S. military assistance. (15) In all these inquiries, scholars have devoted almost no attention to the possibility that naming and shaming strategies are at times influenced by a government's rhetorical response. (16) The existing scholarship assumes that rhetorical entrapment is a one-way street.

This Article argues that, rather than being mere targets, governments can and do engage in "reverse rhetorical entrapment," thus shaping the strategies of human rights organizations. (17) Specifically, justifications for egregious conduct--at least when made by powerful governments (18)--may draw human rights advocates into consequentialist debates about the utility of specific rights-violating practices. Using the case of coercive interrogation in the United States, this Article show how Human Rights Watch (HRW) was entrapped by the consequentialist justifications of President George Bush's Administration. In explaining and defending its interrogation practices, the administration turned to the "war on terror" discourse that aimed to deflect and undermine human rights critiques. (19) For reasons of political practicality, HRW could not simply rely on moral and legal naming and shaming. Rather, it responded with its own consequentialist arguments about torture, focusing specifically on three outcomes: (20)(1) the unreliability of intelligence gathered through coercive interrogation, (2) the effect of U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reverse-Rhetorical Entrapment: Naming and Shaming as a Two-Way Street
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.