When Old Attitudes Shoot Down New Innovations in U.S. Weaponry; Clashes over the Faulty M4 Are Just the Latest in American Military History

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), February 28, 2014 | Go to article overview

When Old Attitudes Shoot Down New Innovations in U.S. Weaponry; Clashes over the Faulty M4 Are Just the Latest in American Military History


Byline: Jim Supica

With the combat suitability, or lack thereof, of the U.S. M4 rifle in recent headlines, it's worth remembering that the history of America's military arms is replete with failures, successes and controversy. One of the best-known examples occurred during the American Civil War.

Rightly or wrongly, the decisions of one man would be credited with extending the bloodshed of the War Between the States by as much as two years. Some historians have contended that the refusal of Union Chief of Ordnance James Wolfe Ripley to adapt to new firearms technology cost tens or even hundreds of thousands of casualties.

The outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861 came at a time of dramatic technological improvements in firearms. One major area of innovation was the introduction of breech-loading rifles and carbines.

For three centuries, firearms had been muzzle loading. Gunpowder was poured into the front end, or muzzle, of the barrel, followed by a lead ball. which was then firmly rammed in place before the gun could be fired. This was very difficult to accomplish in any position other than standing, which exposed the shooter to enemy fire in combat. The burnt black powder left fouling residue in the barrel, requiring more force and more time to ram successive lead balls down the tight barrel for follow-up shots as the dirt and debris constricted the diameter of the bore.

A gun that could be loaded from the breech, or rear, of the barrel solved both these problems. The shooter could remain prone behind cover while reloading , and since a new charge was inserted at the rear of the barrel, the residue of the previous shot did not interfere with loading.

By the outbreak of the Civil War, numerous breech-loading designs were available, some of dubious quality. Others, such as the famous Sharps design, had the system pretty much perfected.

Ripley was not a fan. A former superintendent of the main U.S. arsenal, Springfield Armory, Ripley was appointed as chief of ordnance for the U.S. Army in the first month of the Civil War. At age 67, he was put in charge of selecting and acquiring Union weaponry. As a former artillery commander, he is credited with modernizing the Army's crew-served ordnance.

However, he adamantly opposed the purchase of breech-loading firearms. He believed them to be unreliable and that they led troops to waste ammunition by firing faster, complicating the issue of ammunition resupply.

Ripley also declined to replace existing smoothbore muskets with rifles, wrongly believing that existing arms could be converted by rifling the barrels, and refused to purchase state of the art British Enfield rifled muskets. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

When Old Attitudes Shoot Down New Innovations in U.S. Weaponry; Clashes over the Faulty M4 Are Just the Latest in American Military History
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.